Cited by 26Migration and Labor DynamicsMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationChina's Global Influence and Migration

Informality and the context of reception in South Africa's new immigrant destinations

Theodore, Nik, Pretorius, Anmar, Blaauw, Derick, Schenck, Catherina·2018·Population, Space and Place

Abstract

This study examines the context of reception for Zimbabwean migrants who are engaged in South Africa's informal economy. It seeks to contribute to two areas of migration scholarship: (a) the emergence of new immigrant destinations in the global South and (b) the role of the informal economy in shaping the context of reception for migrants in new gateway cities. Through surveys of Zimbabwean day labourers in Tshwane (formerly Pretoria), we document the poverty and the food and housing insecurity these migrants and their dependents endure resulting from underemployment in the informal economy. The analysis presented here suggests that although it has received little attention from migration scholars, the informal economy can play a significant role in shaping the context of reception for immigrants in the new gateway cities of the global South. In many destination countries, the informal economy absorbs large numbers of migrants, making it an important, if flawed, source of employment, earnings, and remittances. With increasing levels of migration to major cities, the informal economy has become a key arena of migrant incorporation, with far‐reaching implications for lives and livelihoods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/psp.2119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Theodore, N., Pretorius, A., Blaauw, D., & Schenck, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • North-West University (ZA)
  • Department of Social Work University of the Western Cape Bellville South Africa
Corresponding author
Theodore, Nik
Venue
Population, Space and Place
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-30
Volume
24
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1544-8444 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-8452
OpenAlex
W2766786603
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Population Space and Place (publishedVersion)
  • UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › China's Global Influence and Migration
Keywords
informal economy, migrant reception, Zimbabwean migrants, day laborers, underemployment, poverty, food insecurity, housing insecurity, immigrant integration, Tshwane, South Africa, remittances, urban migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review