The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Handling drop‐out in longitudinal clinical trials: a comparison of the LOCF and MMRM approaches
Open accessAbstract
This study compares two methods for handling missing data in longitudinal trials: one using the last‐observation‐carried‐forward (LOCF) method and one based on a multivariate or mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM). Using data sets simulated to match six actual trials, I imposed several drop‐out mechanisms, and compared the methods in terms of bias in the treatment difference and power of the treatment comparison. With equal drop‐out in Active and Placebo arms, LOCF generally underestimated the treatment effect; but with unequal drop‐out, bias could be much larger and in either direction. In contrast, bias with the MMRM method was much smaller; and whereas MMRM rarely caused a difference in power of greater than 20%, LOCF caused a difference in power of greater than 20% in nearly half the simulations. Use of the LOCF method is therefore likely to misrepresent the results of a trial seriously, and so is not a good choice for primary analysis. In contrast, the MMRM method is unlikely to result in serious misinterpretation, unless the drop‐out mechanism is missing not at random (MNAR) and there is substantially unequal drop‐out. Moreover, MMRM is clearly more reliable and better grounded statistically. Neither method is capable of dealing on its own with trials involving MNAR drop‐out mechanisms, for which sensitivity analysis is needed using more complex methods. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Building on a likelihood-based approach, the linear mixed models analysis uses all available data and produces unbiased parameter estimates under the assumption of data being missing at random, making it suitable for intention-to-treat analyses in longitudinal studies with data missing at random [56-58].”
From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
Molenberghs, G., & Verbeke, G. N. (2000) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0300-6 · Cited by 2,681
Roderick J.A. Little, Donald B. Rubin — Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Bo., N., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Population · doi:10.2307/1533221 · Cited by 2,163
Gueorguieva, R., & Krystal, J. H. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.310 · Cited by 1,529
Analyzing incomplete longitudinal clinical trial data
Molenberghs, G. (2004) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/5.3.445 · Cited by 463
ACCOUNTING FOR DROPOUT BIAS USING MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS
Mallinckrodt, C. H., Clark, W. S., & David, S. R. (2001) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1081/bip-100104194 · Cited by 398
Analyzing incomplete longitudinal clinical trial data
Molenberghs, G. (2004) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxh001 · Cited by 378
A multiple imputation strategy for clinical trials with truncation of patient data
Lavori, P. W., Dawson, R., & Shera, D. M. (1995) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780141707 · Cited by 291
Assessing and interpreting treatment effects in longitudinal clinical trials with missing data
Mallinckrodt, C. H., Sanger, T. M., Dubé, S., DeBrota, D. J., Molenberghs, G., Carroll, R. J., Potter, W. Z., & Tollefson, G. D. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01867-x · Cited by 250
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–263 of 263
Machine Learning Feature Selection in Archery Performance
Mahajan, U., Krishnan, A., Malhotra, V., Sharma, D., & Gore, S. D. (2021) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8391-9_41 · Cited by 4
Peters, E. M., Yilmaz, O., Li, C., & Balbuena, L. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.112 · Cited by 4
The efficacy of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder
Dhir, A., & Sarvaiya, J. (2014) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/14737175.2014.987131 · Cited by 4
“[35] and Lane [36] about negative influence of wrong selection of statistical method on outcome of clinical trials.”
MethodGestión e Interpretación de Datos Obtenidos en Ensayos Clínicos de Manejo del Dolor
Theodore, B. R., & Gatchel, R. J. (2009) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00326.x · Cited by 3
“Mecanismos multivariantes más complejos para encarar la ausencia de datos consisten en generar matrices de correlación de los datos ausentes y utilizar métodos de estimación basados en regresión; estos mecanismos se detallan exhaustivamente por Tabachnick y Fidell,(7) Mallinckrodt et al,(11) y Lane.(10) Sin embargo, c…”
BackgroundWhich aspects of anhedonia predict response to pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder?
Uher, R., Rizvi, S. J., Quilty, L. C., Pavlová, B., Nunes, A., Foster, J. A., Lam, R. W. M., Milev, R. V., Müller, D. J., Taylor, V., et al. (2025) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291725102894 · Cited by 3
“This approach has been recommended as it provides results that are relatively robust to common sources of bias (Lane, 2008; Siddiqui, 2011; Siddiqui, Hung, & O ’ Neill, 2009).”
Andersson, R., Vigerland, S., Lenhard, F., Åhlén, J., Bottai, M., Mataix‐Cols, D., & Serlachius, E. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083507 · Cited by 3
“66 The estimated interaction effect will be reported with an accompanying 95% CI and p value.”
Tan, E. W., Chai, S. C., Sankai, Y., Shingu, M., Razaob, N. A., & Hussain, H. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322191 · Cited by 4
“The LOCF method is also prone to substantial misrepresentation of trial results and is an unsuitable choice for primary analysis [41].”
Analysis of Imputation Methods for Missing Data in AR(1) Longitudinal Dataset
Nakai, M. (2011) · International Journal of Mathematical Analysis · Cited by 3
Yuen, E., Gueorguieva, I., & Aarons, L. J. (2014) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-014-1380-9 · Cited by 3
The role of BMI change on smoking abstinence in a sample of HIV-infected smokers
Buchberg, M. K., Gritz, E. R., Kypriotakis, G., Arduino, R. C., & Vidrine, D. J. (2015) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2015.1120854 · Cited by 3
“This methodology has been used in other randomized controlled trials, including those focusing on HIV and weight loss (Fairclough, Thijs, Huang, Finnern, & Wu, 2008; Lane, 2008; Ware, 2003).”
MethodSimulation Study: Introduction of Imputation Methods for Missing Data in Longitudinal Analysis
Nakai, M. (2011) · Cited by 3
Patient-reported outcomes in the context of the benefit assessment in GermanyPreprint
Böhme, S., Gerlinger, C., Huschens, S., Kucka, A., Kürschner, N., Leverkus, F., Schlichting, M., Siemens, W., Sternberg, K., & Hofmann-Xu, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03249 · Cited by 3
“Lane P. Handling drop-out in longitudinal clinical trials: a comparison of the LOCF and MMRM approaches.”
InfluentialZhang, Z., Chen, Z., Liu, Q., Xie, J., & Hongtu Zhu, B. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3711896.3737116 · Cited by 2
Sherman, K., Sun, J., & Lin, C. K. (2010) · Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies · doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2010.01057_3.x · Cited by 2
Predicting Competitive Weightlifting Performance Using Regression and Tree-Based Algorithms
Mahajan, U. S., Krishnan, A., Malhotra, V., Sharma, D., & Gore, S. D. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3383-9_36 · Cited by 2
Tompkins, G., Dubin, J. A., & Wallace, M. P. (2025) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802241313289 · Cited by 2
“However, one must be cautious when employing this method when a non-trivial proportion of Z i ( t ) are missing, as it can bias the parameters estimated in proportional hazards (PH) models [21, 22, 23, 24] and longitudinal models [25, 26, 27].”
Analysis of Missing Mechanism in IVUS Imaging Clinical Trials with Missing Covariates
Hu, M., & Zhou, T. (2011) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2011.550110 · Cited by 2
“This calls for caution when we apply the LOCF method, which has been widely discussed in the literature (Saha and Jones, 2009; Lane, 2008; Cook et al., 2004; Siddiqui and Ali, 1998).”
MethodManagement and Interpretation of Data Obtained from Clinical Trials in Pain Management
Theodore, B. R., & Gatchel, R. J. (2008) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00240.x · Cited by 2
“The LOCF procedure simply uses the last known value for a given variable as the estimate of the missing data, under the assumption that the measure would remain stable given the dropout from the full treatment protocol.8 However, studies on data simulation have revealed that the LOCF method often results in an underes…”
BackgroundEfficacy of Olanzapine for Treating Depressive Episodes in Bipolar Disorder
Kirino, E. (2014) · Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.5234/cnpt.5.11 · Cited by 2
“Second, the use of LOCF has been severely criticized recently because it is almost certain to create bias, although the method has been used for many years in several therapeutic areas, and is sometimes justified on the grounds that it is conservative; in other words, it tends to underestimate treatment effects [22].”
MethodA Simple Correction to Completer Analyses and Improvement on Baseline Observation Carried Forward
Petroff, D. (2017) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12661 · Cited by 2
Very Large Scale Bayesian Machine Learning
Cai, Z. (2014) · Rice Research Repository (Rice University) · Cited by 2
Gosho, M., & Maruo, K. (2017) · Ouyou toukeigaku · doi:10.5023/jappstat.46.53 · Cited by 1
Li, C., Yilmaz, O., & Peters, E. M. (2025) · Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pmip.2025.100153 · Cited by 1
Diaz, K. M., Murdock, M. E., Serafini, M. A., Clark, A. W., Boudreaux, B. D., Duran, A. T., Meshkinpour, S., Monteleone, K., Cheung, Y. K., & Zomorodi, M. (2026) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2025-111221 · Cited by 1
Wang, J., Rapatz, G., Lowy, A., Olson, S., & Kuebler, J. (2008) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.333 · Cited by 1
Thomas, S., Thomas, P., Kersten, P., Jones, R., Green, C., Nock, A., Slingsby, V., Hillier, C. E. M., Galvin, K., & Baker, R. D. (2012) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-301993.176 · Cited by 1
Ueberall, M. A., Müller-Schwefe, G. H. H., Emrich, O. M. D., Horlemann, J., Längler, K., Maurer, S., & Essner, U. (2015) · MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s15006-015-7566-1 · Cited by 1
Joint modeling of missing and mismeasured measurements for computing radiotherapy margins
Bhattacharjee, A., Jose, J., Vishwakarma, G. K., & Kumar, R. (2017) · Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health · doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2016.12.003 · Cited by 1
Lu, J., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2022.2080697 · Cited by 1
“Although no formal test can be used for verifying the MAR assumption, the MMRM for dealing with missing data has been studied broadly (Lane 2008; Mallinckrodt et al. 2004) and applied in clinical trials.”
MethodHanks, R. A., Simpson, G. K., Perrine, B. W., Rapport, L. J., Kotasek, R., & Millis, S. R. (2025) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2025.2491787 · Cited by 1
“The primary statistical method was the linear mixed model (LMM) used to examine treatment effects, time, and their interactions, and followed intention-to-treat principles (51,52).”
Moeller, J., Lieb, R., Meyer, A. H., Lötscher, K. Q., Krastel, B., & Meinlschmidt, G. (2014) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.02.012 · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, we applied a mixed-model analysis that is the method of choice for analyzing repeated ambulatory saliva data in which missing values are usually present (cf. Singer and Willett, 2003; Lane, 2008; Kudielka et al., 2012).”
MethodBigotry in Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Analysis
Sampoornam, W. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Education and Research · doi:10.52711/2454-2660.2022.00005 · Cited by 1
Mindfulness training for medical and psychology students
Vibe, M. F. D. (2014) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 1
Park, M., Lai, D., Du, X. L., Delclos, G. P., & Moyé, L. A. (2015) · Current Research in Biostatistics · doi:10.3844/amjbsp.2015.7.51
“Also, it addresses a serious bias unless MCAR holds (Lane, 2008).”
BackgroundEFFICACY AND PROCESSES OF CHANGE IN ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY FOR CHRONIC PAIN
Kemani, M. K. (2015) · Figshare
Tuomilehto, H., Seppä, J., & Peltonen, M. (2010) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.110.006254
Stiger, T. R., & Banerjee, A. (2013) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2013.834910
Repeated Measures Analyses in Clinical Trials with Titration Visits
Dinh, P. V., & Yang, P. (2009) · Drug Information Journal · doi:10.1177/009286150904300508
Li, X., Liu, J., Duan, N., Jiang, H., Girgis, R. R., & Lieberman, J. A. (2014) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6090
Douglas, E. L. (2007) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
MODELING THE SMOKING STATUS OF KENYA'S MALES IN THE PRESENCE OF MISSING DATA
Umugiraneza, O. (2014)
Vogler, M. (2015) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
Wolf, I. (2016) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-5709
Approaches to Clinical Research in Pediatric Nephrology
Sander, A., & Sutherland, S. M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-52972-0_7
MoodSwings: an online self-guided intervention for bipolar disorder
Lauder, S. D. (2016) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)
Applications of stochastic modeling and data analytics techniques in healthcare decision making
Dalgic, O. O. (2017) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
Variation in analytic transparency in recent efficacy studies of antidepressant medication
Vannoy, S. D., Brodt, M., Cosgrove, L., & Shaughnessy, A. F. (2018) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110947
Rodenberg, C., Schnell, D. J., & Liu, C. (2012) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14674-70
Rodenberg, C., Schnell, D. J., & Liu, C. S. (2010) · Informa Healthcare eBooks · doi:10.3109/9781439822463.069
Burzykowski, T., Carpenter, J. R., Coens, C., Evans, D., France, L., Kenward, M., Lane, P. W., Matcham, J., Phillips, A., Roger, J., et al. (2003) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.39
Self-citationEstimands in clinical drug development: from design to regulatory assessment
Mitroiu, M. (2022) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/723
Lauri, K. O., Aspvall, K., Lybert, N., Samuelsson, C., Liliequist, B. E., Håkansson, E., Serlachius, E., Rück, C., Mataix-Cols, D., & Andersson, E. (2025) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2025.104708
Boucher, M., Marshall, S. F., & Gaitonde, P. (2025) · CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.70070
“Simulation approaches have been taken to assess relative bias and/or precision across different imputation strategies [6, 7, 29].”
Missing Data and Measurement Errors: Statistical Approach to Incomplete Data Analysis
Furukawa, K., Kumano, N., Kawazoe, Y., & Nakakura, A. (2025) · Japanese Journal of Biometrics · doi:10.5691/jjb.46.101
Gates, M. W., Metz, M. A., & Schauff, M. E. (2006) · INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.173298
Calear, A. L., Macleod, E., Hoye, A. M., McCallum, S. M., Morse, A. R., Farrer, L. M., & Batterham, P. J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25596449
Calear, A. L., Macleod, E., Hoye, A. M., McCallum, S. M., Morse, A. R., Farrer, L. M., & Batterham, P. J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25596537
Zeng, Z., Jiang, J., Xie, K., Luo, N., Guan, X., Zhu, C., Lu, Z., & Huang, L. (2026) · Nature and Science of Sleep · doi:10.2147/nss.s578770
“63 Additionally, LOCF can underestimate the standard error and p values, increasing the risk of Type I error.”
Klinische Forschungsdesigns und Stichproben
Mundorf, A., Peterburs, J., & Ocklenburg, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-73259-5_5
Shafi, T., Anker, S. D., Pitt, B., Ruilope, L. M., Rossing, P. R., BRINKER, M. D., Rohwedder, K., Scott, C., Farag, Y. M. K., & Filippatos, G. S. (2026) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1093/ejhf/xuag299
Sökmen, O. (2026) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2026.107963
Söderholm, P., & Brander, G. (2013) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Metadata
- Authors
- Lane, P.
- Affiliations
- GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lane, Peter
- ORCID
- Lane, Peter
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-106
- ISSN
- 1539-1604 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-1612
- OpenAlex
- W2068456795
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 17.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Pharmaceutical Statistics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- dropout, missing data, last observation carried forward, bias in treatment effect estimation, statistical power, missing not at random, sensitivity analysis
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Patient Dropouts, Bias, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
