Cited by 89Medicinal Plant Extracts EffectsSleep and related disordersComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled investigation of the effects of two doses of a valerian preparation on the sleep, cognitive and psychomotor function of sleep‐disturbed older adults

Open access
Diaper, A., Hindmarch, I.·2004·Phytotherapy Research

Abstract

One of the most popular herbal remedies for the alleviation of sleep problems is valerian. However, research into valerian is sparse, and studies differ greatly with respect to design, measures, and preparations used. This clinical study used standardized sleep EEG and psychometric tests to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a valerian preparation (Li 156). A placebo‐controlled three way crossover clinical trial was completed using 16 (5 male and 11 female) sleep‐disturbed participants (aged 50 to 64 years, mean age 55.9, SD 4.68). Participants slept overnight in a sleep laboratory, following a 21:00 hours dose of valerian 300 mg, valerian 600 mg, or placebo (double‐blind). EEG sleep was recorded for each participant at 23:00 hours until 07:00 hours, when a psychometric evaluation was performed the morning after dose. Test periods were separated by six days washout period. Results showed no significant effect between valerian 300 mg, valerian 600 mg or placebo on any EEG parameter or psychometric measure. This suggests valerian at these doses is ineffective as an acute dose for sleep problems. However, valerian is widely used, and is traditionally sedative. Therefore, more research is required into therapeutic dose, types of valerian preparation, and the optimum period of use for therapeutic effect. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ptr.1574

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Akerele A, 1992, WHO guidelines for the assessment of herbal medicines, Fitoterapia, 62, 99
  2. 10.1007/BF00432503 · DOI
  3. Bisset NG, 1994, Herbal Drugs and Phytopharmaceuticals, 513
  4. 10.1037/1099-9809.6.1.84 · DOI
  5. 10.1055/s-2000-7972 · DOI
  6. 10.1055/s-2007-969384 · DOI
  7. Hindmarch I, 1975, A 1‐4‐benzodiazepine, temazepam (K 3917), its effect on some psychological parameters of sleep and behaviour, Arzneim Forsch, 25, 1836
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01745.x · DOI
  9. 10.1211/0022357991772772 · DOI
  10. 10.1055/s-2007-991100 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90013-9 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0091-3057(82)90264-7 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90082-8 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/archfami.7.6.523 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1077(199701/02)12:1<65::AID-HUP838>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S0033291700014379 · DOI
  17. 10.7326/0003-4819-144-11-200606060-00004 · DOI
  18. Spielberger CD, 1970, The State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Test Manual
  19. Spielberger CD, 1995, Clinical Personality Assessment: Practical Approaches
  20. 10.1126/science.153.3736.652 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Vorbach EU, 1996, Therapie von insomnen: Wirksumkeit und vertraglichkeit eines baldrian‐praparates, Psychopharmakotherapie, 3, 109
  22. Willey LB, 1995, Valerian overdose: a case report, Veterinary Hum Toxicol, 37, 364
  23. Ziegler G, 2002, Efficacy and tolerability of valerian extract Li 156 compared with oxazepam in the treatment of non‐organic insomnia: A randomised, double‐blind, comparative clinical study, Eur J Med Res, 7, 480

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Diaper, A., & Hindmarch, I.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Diaper, A.
Venue
Phytotherapy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
831-836
ISSN
  • 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1573
OpenAlex
W2141328249
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
Valeriana officinalis, herbal medicine, sleep disorders, insomnia, older adults, sleep EEG, cognitive function, psychomotor performance, sedative effects, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Aging, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Psychomotor Performance, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Valerian, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review