Barberry Treatment Reduces Serum Anti-Heat Shock Protein 27 and 60 Antibody Titres and High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: A Double-blind, Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial: BARBERRY AND ANTI-HSP ANTIBODIES
Open accessAbstract
Metabolic syndrome is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The heat shock proteins (HSPs) are associated with risk factors for CVD. The aim of the present study was to survey the effect of barberry on antibody titres to HSPs and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in patients with metabolic syndrome. In our study, subjects (N=106, 79 women and 27 men, 18-65 years old) with metabolic syndrome were randomized into two groups: a group of patients who received three capsules of barberry and a control group who received three capsules of placebo for 6 weeks. Antibodies against HSPs 27, 60/65 and 70, hs-CRP and lipid profile were determined in patients before (week 0) and after (week 6) intervention. spss software (version 16.0; Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for data analysis. Results showed that barberry had no significant effect on serum level of anti-HSPs 65 and 70. But there was a significant decrease in anti-HSP 27 in both case and control groups (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively, in the case and control groups). Barberry decreased significantly anti-HSP 60 in the case group (p=0.03). High-sensitivity CRP was decreased non-significantly (p=0.17) in the case group and increased significantly (p=0.04) in the control group. Barberry decreased significantly low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol and increased significantly high-density cholesterol (p<0.05). Results of the present study suggested that barberry supplementation in patients with metabolic syndrome decreased significantly anti-HSPs 27 and 60 and hs-CRP levels and improved lipid profile.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Zilaee, M., Kermany, T., Tavalaee, S., Salehi, M., Ghayour-Mobarhan, M., & Ferns, G. A. A.
- Affiliations
- Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Department of Anatomy; Birjand University of Medical Sciences; Birjand Iran
- Biochemistry of Nutrition Research Center, School of Medicine; Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; Mashhad Iran
- Keele University (GB)
- Venue
- Phytotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-17
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1211-1215
- ISSN
- 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122635052
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
- Keywords
- Berberis, Berberis vulgaris, metabolic syndrome, heat shock proteins, HSP27, HSP60, HSP70, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipid profile, cardiovascular risk, herbal supplementation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antibodies, C-Reactive Protein, Cholesterol, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heat-Shock Proteins, Humans, Lipoproteins, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Molecular Chaperones, Chaperonin 60, Dietary Supplements, Mitochondrial Proteins, Metabolic Syndrome, Berberis, HSP27 Heat-Shock Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review