Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 542

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An improved fast radiative transfer model for assimilation of satellite radiance observations

Saunders, R., Matricardi, M., Brunel, P.·1999·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

To assimilate atmospheric and surface radiance measurements from satellites in a numerical weather prediction model, a fast radiative transfer model is required to compute radiances from the model first guess fields at every observation point. Such a model for satellite infrared and microwave radiance measurements is used operationally for the assimilation of TIROS operational vertical sounder radiances at the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts. An improved version of this model has been developed which requires ozone, in addition to temperature and water vapour, in the input profile and it has been generalized to compute radiances for other satellite radiometers using the same code. Instruments such as the high resolution infrared radiation sounder and the advanced microwave sounding unit on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration polar orbiters, the METEOSAT water vapour imager and the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite infrared sounder have been simulated. It is demonstrated, by comparisons with line‐by‐line model computed radiances, that the fast model can reproduce the line‐by‐line model radiances for the TIROS operational vertical sounder stratospheric temperature sounding channels to an accuracy below the instrumental noise. The tropospheric, surface sensing, water vapour and ozone channel radiances cannot be predicted to such an accuracy, but still accurately enough for numerical weather prediction assimilation. A comparison of measured TIROS operational vertical sounder radiances with predicted values from numerical weather prediction model analyses gives larger differences than would be expected from the combination of the fast model and instrument related errors for most channels. The validity of the tangent linear approximation of the model gradient for typical radiance departures is also explored, with several examples, for the high resolution infrared radiation sounder/advanced microwave sounding unit instrument combination. The tangent‐linear approximation is valid for temperature but significant departures from linearity about the first guess profile are observed for water vapour and ozone. Cloud affected infrared radiances have a highly non‐linear response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.1999.49712555615

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 542

Metadata

Authors
Saunders, R., Matricardi, M., & Brunel, P.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-04
Volume
125
Issue
556
Pages
1407-1425
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2090988712
Cited by
542
References
0
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved fast radiative transfer model for assimilation of satellite radiance observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.1999.49712555615
The paper
Saunders, R., Matricardi, M., & Brunel, P. (1999). An improved fast radiative transfer model for assimilation of satellite radiance observations. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1999.49712555615

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.