The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of upper‐level dynamics and surface processes for the Pakistan flood of July 2010
Open accessAbstract
In July and August 2010 floods of unprecedented impact afflicted Pakistan. The floods resulted from a series of intense multi‐day precipitation events in July and early August. At the same time a series of blocking anticyclones dominated the upper‐level flow over western Russia and breaking waves i.e. equatorward extrusions of stratospheric high potential vorticity (PV) air formed along the downstream flank of the blocks. Previous studies suggested that these extratropical upper‐level breaking waves were crucial for instigating the precipitation events in Pakistan. Here a detailed analysis is provided of the extratropical forcing of the precipitation. Piecewise PV inversion is used to quantify the extratropical upper‐level forcing associated with the wave breaking and trajectories are calculated to study the pathways and source regions of the moisture that precipitated over Pakistan. Limited‐area model simulations are carried out to complement the Lagrangian analysis. The precipitation events over Pakistan resulted from a combination of favourable boundary conditions with strong extratropical and monsoonal forcing factors. Above‐normal sea‐surface temperatures in the Indian Ocean led to an elevated lower‐tropospheric moisture content. Surface monsoonal depressions ensured the transport of moist air from the ocean towards northeastern Pakistan. Along this pathway the air parcel humidity increased substantially (60–90% of precipitated moisture) via evapotranspiration from the land surface. Extratropical breaking waves influenced the surface wind field substantially by enhancing the wind component directed towards the mountains which reinforced the precipitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hot Summer of 2010: Redrawing the Temperature Record Map of Europe
Barriopedro, D., Fischer, E. M., Luterbacher, J., Trigo, R. M., & García-Herrera, R. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201224 · Cited by 1,656
Cited by
Observed heavy precipitation increase confirms theory and early models
Fischer, E. M., & Knutti, R. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3110 · Cited by 758
The Pakistan Flood of August 2022: Causes and Implications
Nanditha, J. S., Kushwaha, A. P., Singh, R., Malik, I., Solanki, H., Chuphal, D. S., Dangar, S., Mahto, S. S., Vegad, U., & Mishra, V. (2023) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef003230 · Cited by 269
Causes of 2022 Pakistan flooding and its linkage with China and Europe heatwaves
Hong, C.-C., Huang, A.-Y., Hsu, H.-H., Tseng, W.-L., Lu, M.-M., & Chang, C.-C. (2023) · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science · doi:10.1038/s41612-023-00492-2 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Martius, O., Sodemann, H., Joos, H., Pfahl, S., Winschall, A., Croci‐Maspoli, M., Graf, M., Madonna, E., Mueller, B., Schemm, S., Sedláček, J., Sprenger, M., & Wernli, H.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-12
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 676
- Pages
- 1780-1797
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W1497111451
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of upper‐level dynamics and surface processes for the Pakistan flood of July 2010. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.2082
- The paper
- Martius, O., Sodemann, H., Joos, H., Pfahl, S., Winschall, A., Croci‐Maspoli, M., Graf, M., Madonna, E., Mueller, B., Schemm, S., Sedláček, J., Sprenger, M., & Wernli, H. (2013). The role of upper‐level dynamics and surface processes for the Pakistan flood of July 2010. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.