The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representation and prediction of the Indian Ocean dipole in the POAMA seasonal forecast model
Abstract
Predictive skill of the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) using the Bureau of Meteorology's POAMA seasonal forecast model is assessed in light of the model's ability to represent the coupled nature of the IOD. The analysis is based on a ten‐member ensemble of nine‐month forecasts that are initialized from observed ocean and atmosphere states once per month for the period 1982–2006. Some aspects of the IOD are well represented by the POAMA forecast model, including the seasonal phase locking of the development of the IOD but the IOD's horizontal structure is distorted and its amplitude weakens with increasing forecast lead time, while at the same time the IOD becomes spuriously overdependent on ENSO. These deficiencies in the representation of the IOD are attributed to model error (including horizontal resolution and development of biases in the mean state), which affects depiction of important coupled dynamics for the IOD as well as the role of remote forcing of the IOD by ENSO (which itself exhibits distortion of its spatial structure attributed to biases in the simulated mean state). In the light of these limitations of representing the IOD in the POAMA forecast model, skilful prediction of the peak phase of the IOD in September–November is limited to about a four‐month lead time, with a rapid drop in skill for forecasts initialized before June. Forecast skill for the IOD appears to be limited mainly by ability to predict development of SST anomalies in its eastern pole. Potential predictability estimates, assuming a perfect model, indicate great scope for improved prediction, although the IOD is much less predictable (potentially and in practice) than ENSO. The deficient depiction of the IOD at longer lead times means that estimates of potential predictability assuming a perfect model may be unreliable. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean
Saji, N. H., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P. N., & Yamagata, T. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43854 · Cited by 5,510
Coupled ocean–atmosphere dynamics in the Indian Ocean during 1997–98
Webster, P. J., Moore, A. M., Loschnigg, J. P., & Leben, R. R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43848 · Cited by 2,144
Cited by
Seasonal climate predictability and forecasting: status and prospects
Doblas‐Reyes, F. J., García‐Serrano, J., Lienert, F., Biescas, A. P., & Rodrigues, L. R. L. (2013) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.217 · Cited by 478
Deo, R. C., & Şahin, M. (2015) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.10.016 · Cited by 317
Prediction of the Madden–Julian oscillation with the POAMA dynamical prediction system
Rashid, H. A., Hendon, H. H., Wheeler, M. C., & Alves, O. (2011) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0754-x · Cited by 242
Self-citationUnderstanding Rossby wave trains forced by the Indian Ocean Dipole
McIntosh, P. C., & Hendon, H. H. (2018) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-017-3771-1 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, M., & Hendon, H. H.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 639
- Pages
- 337-352
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2124037634
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Representation and prediction of the Indian Ocean dipole in the POAMA seasonal forecast model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.370
- The paper
- Zhao, M., & Hendon, H. H. (2009). Representation and prediction of the Indian Ocean dipole in the POAMA seasonal forecast model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.370
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.