Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Representation and prediction of the Indian Ocean dipole in the POAMA seasonal forecast model

Zhao, Mei, Hendon, Harry H.·2009·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

Predictive skill of the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) using the Bureau of Meteorology's POAMA seasonal forecast model is assessed in light of the model's ability to represent the coupled nature of the IOD. The analysis is based on a ten‐member ensemble of nine‐month forecasts that are initialized from observed ocean and atmosphere states once per month for the period 1982–2006. Some aspects of the IOD are well represented by the POAMA forecast model, including the seasonal phase locking of the development of the IOD but the IOD's horizontal structure is distorted and its amplitude weakens with increasing forecast lead time, while at the same time the IOD becomes spuriously overdependent on ENSO. These deficiencies in the representation of the IOD are attributed to model error (including horizontal resolution and development of biases in the mean state), which affects depiction of important coupled dynamics for the IOD as well as the role of remote forcing of the IOD by ENSO (which itself exhibits distortion of its spatial structure attributed to biases in the simulated mean state). In the light of these limitations of representing the IOD in the POAMA forecast model, skilful prediction of the peak phase of the IOD in September–November is limited to about a four‐month lead time, with a rapid drop in skill for forecasts initialized before June. Forecast skill for the IOD appears to be limited mainly by ability to predict development of SST anomalies in its eastern pole. Potential predictability estimates, assuming a perfect model, indicate great scope for improved prediction, although the IOD is much less predictable (potentially and in practice) than ENSO. The deficient depiction of the IOD at longer lead times means that estimates of potential predictability assuming a perfect model may be unreliable. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.370

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, M., & Hendon, H. H.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01
Volume
135
Issue
639
Pages
337-352
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2124037634
Cited by
158
References
2
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Representation and prediction of the Indian Ocean dipole in the POAMA seasonal forecast model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.370
The paper
Zhao, M., & Hendon, H. H. (2009). Representation and prediction of the Indian Ocean dipole in the POAMA seasonal forecast model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.370

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.