Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The propagation of eddies in diffluent jetstreams: Eddy vorticity forcing of ‘blocking’ flow fields

Shutts, G. J.·1983·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

Numerical experiments are performed with barotropic models to test a hypothesized mechanism by which barotropic eddies can, through Reynolds stresses, reinforce blocking flow patterns. Eddies propagating into a split Jetstream suffer an east‐west compression and north‐south extension of their vorticity fields and this enhanced, local enstrophy cascade is associated with energy transmission to the straining flow (i.e. the blocking flow field) and a characteristic pattern of vorticity forcing by transient motion. As a first step in demonstrating this mechanism, the barotropic vorticity equation is integrated in a form linearized about a state chosen to represent a split Jetstream with a prescribed eddy forcing function upstream. After thirty days of model integration, the time‐mean eddy kinetic energy, enstrophy and vorticity flux divergence are calculated, together with mean eddy vorticity flux vectors. The resulting eddy vorticity forcing field can be used to determine the second‐order induced flow. Experiments with the nonlinear barotropic vorticity equation show that dipole blocking patterns can be created simply by the introduction of an eddy generator into sufficiently weak, uniform westerly flow. Eddies alone are responsible for the block since the time‐mean vorticity equation has no external forcing functions such as an orographic term. Monthly mean statistics are again calculated and terms in the time‐mean vorticity equation are compared. Anticyclonic eddy vorticity forcing appears just upstream of the ‘blocking high’ in agreement with data analysed by Illari (1982) for the anomalous circulation over Europe in July 1976. Model flow fields fluctuate in a manner highly reminiscent of blocking episodes as observed in 500mb contour maps with strong bursts of southerly winds on the western flank of blocking highs during the approach and subsequent stagnation of each depression. The proposed straining mechanism and model simulations are in agreement with early observational studies of blocking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.49710946204

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Shutts, G. J.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-10
Volume
109
Issue
462
Pages
737-761
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2089133721
Cited by
437
References
1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The propagation of eddies in diffluent jetstreams: Eddy vorticity forcing of ‘blocking’ flow fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49710946204
The paper
Shutts, G. J. (1983). The propagation of eddies in diffluent jetstreams: Eddy vorticity forcing of ‘blocking’ flow fields. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710946204

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.