The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The propagation of eddies in diffluent jetstreams: Eddy vorticity forcing of ‘blocking’ flow fields
Abstract
Numerical experiments are performed with barotropic models to test a hypothesized mechanism by which barotropic eddies can, through Reynolds stresses, reinforce blocking flow patterns. Eddies propagating into a split Jetstream suffer an east‐west compression and north‐south extension of their vorticity fields and this enhanced, local enstrophy cascade is associated with energy transmission to the straining flow (i.e. the blocking flow field) and a characteristic pattern of vorticity forcing by transient motion. As a first step in demonstrating this mechanism, the barotropic vorticity equation is integrated in a form linearized about a state chosen to represent a split Jetstream with a prescribed eddy forcing function upstream. After thirty days of model integration, the time‐mean eddy kinetic energy, enstrophy and vorticity flux divergence are calculated, together with mean eddy vorticity flux vectors. The resulting eddy vorticity forcing field can be used to determine the second‐order induced flow. Experiments with the nonlinear barotropic vorticity equation show that dipole blocking patterns can be created simply by the introduction of an eddy generator into sufficiently weak, uniform westerly flow. Eddies alone are responsible for the block since the time‐mean vorticity equation has no external forcing functions such as an orographic term. Monthly mean statistics are again calculated and terms in the time‐mean vorticity equation are compared. Anticyclonic eddy vorticity forcing appears just upstream of the ‘blocking high’ in agreement with data analysed by Illari (1982) for the anomalous circulation over Europe in July 1976. Model flow fields fluctuate in a manner highly reminiscent of blocking episodes as observed in 500mb contour maps with strong bursts of southerly winds on the western flank of blocking highs during the approach and subsequent stagnation of each depression. The proposed straining mechanism and model simulations are in agreement with early observational studies of blocking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mean flows driven by weak eddies in rotating systems
Mcewan, A. D., Thompson, R. O. R. Y., & Plumb, R. A. (1980) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s002211208000081x · Cited by 24
Cited by
A Climatology of Northern Hemisphere Blocking
Barriopedro, D., García-Herrera, R., Lupo, A. R., & Hernández, E. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3678.1 · Cited by 420
Atmospheric blocking and weather extremes over the Euro-Atlantic sector – a review
Kautz, L.-A., Martius, O., Pfahl, S., Pinto, J. G., Ramos, A. M., Sousa, P. M., & Woollings, T. (2022) · Weather and Climate Dynamics · doi:10.5194/wcd-3-305-2022 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Shutts, G. J.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-10
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 462
- Pages
- 737-761
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2089133721
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The propagation of eddies in diffluent jetstreams: Eddy vorticity forcing of ‘blocking’ flow fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49710946204
- The paper
- Shutts, G. J. (1983). The propagation of eddies in diffluent jetstreams: Eddy vorticity forcing of ‘blocking’ flow fields. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710946204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.