The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computational aspects of moisture transport in global models of the atmosphere
Abstract
Computational aspects of methods used to simulate the transport of water vapour in a global atmospheric general circulation model are examined. A set of properties useful in characterizing numerical methods for modelling atmospheric transport are identified. Spectral and semi‐Lagrangian methods, which are very different in terms of these desired properties are compared. The extent to which the schemes do not satisfy certain properties of the continuous equations provides a measure of one component of the error of the solution. For the spectral scheme, negative specific humidities q indicate such an error component. Conventional semi‐Lagrangian schemes are also susceptible to generating negative values. In addition, they are not inherently conservative. Shape‐preserving semi‐Lagrangian methods do not generate negative values, but still are non‐conservative. the degree to which the advection process does not conserve mass provides a measure of another error associated with the numerical solution. the negative error is shown to be large for the spectral transport scheme, measured either locally or globally. Measured globally, the semi‐Lagrangian transport schemes' conservation errors are equally large. Locally, the correction of this error can be made very much smaller, relative to physical processes in the model. The study highlights the computational problems which still exist within the better numerical methods used to simulate the transport of water vapour, and demonstrates the care with which one must apply computational constraints to the solution. the spectral and semi‐Lagrangian transport schemes produce very different climatologies in model simulations. A comparison of these climatologies will appear elsewhere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability
Kalnay, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802270 · Cited by 3,391
Local Versus Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Diffusion in a Global Climate Model
Holtslag, A. A. M., & Boville, B. A. (1993) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1825:lvnbld>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,109
The Canadian Climate Centre Second-Generation General Circulation Model and Its Equilibrium Climate
McFarlane, N. A., Boer, G. J., Blanchet, J.-P., & Lazare, M. (1992) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1013:tcccsg>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 573
Brasseur, G. P., Hauglustaine, D. A., Walters, S., Rasch, P. J., Müller, J. ‐., Granier, C., & Tie, X. X. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/98jd02397 · Cited by 485
Self-citationLohmann, U., & Roeckner, E. (1996) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/bf00207939 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Rasch, P. J., & Williamson, D. L.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 495
- Pages
- 1071-1090
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2141446254
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational aspects of moisture transport in global models of the atmosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49711649504
- The paper
- Rasch, P. J., & Williamson, D. L. (1990). Computational aspects of moisture transport in global models of the atmosphere. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711649504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.