Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 842

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Two paradigms of baroclinic‐wave life‐cycle behaviour

Thorncroft, C. D., Hoskins, B. J., McIntyre, M. E.·1993·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

Two idealized baroclinic wave‐6 life cycles examined here suggest a framework of opposite extremes (a) in which to view the behaviour of real synoptic‐scale disturbances in middle latitudes, and (b) in which to interrelate the synoptic and wave‐theoretic viewpoints, using the ‘saturation‐propagation‐saturation’ (SPS) picture of wave‐6 life‐cycle behaviour. The two life cycles. dented by LC1 and LC2, are higher‐resolution versions of the Simmons‐Hoskins ‘basic’ and ‘anomalous’ cases (showing strong and weak late decay of eddy kinetic energy, EKE). They illustrate, in varying degrees. Two extreme types of behaviour here disignated ‘anticyclonic’ and ‘cyclonic’, and epitomized by strongly contrasting upper‐air trough behaviour. ‘Anticyclonic’ behaviour dominates the late stages of LC1 and is characterized by backward‐tilted, thinning troughs being advected anticyclonically and equatorward, as in the commoner cases of planetary‐scale mid‐stratospheric ‘Rossby‐wave breaking’. ‘Cyclonic’ behaviour dominates LC2 and is characterized by forward‐tilted, broadening troughs wrapping themselves up cyclonically and poleward. producing major cut‐off cyclones in high latitudes. These morphologies are visualized by upper‐air maps of potential temperature on the nominal tropopause, defined as a constant‐potential‐vorticity surface. Some atmospheric mid‐latitude disturbances examined here, using the same visualization applied to operational analyses, show the same two extreme types of trough behaviour together with intermediate cases. The SPS picture is re‐examined, using Eliassen‐palm and refractive‐index cross‐sections. It is shown, in particular, by reference to a wave‐activity theorem of Haynes, that the late stages of LC2 can be looked upon as a remarkably clear, and morphologically novel, large‐amplitude counterpart of the nonlinear reflection scenario of Rossby‐wave critical‐layer theory. The late stages of LC1, by constrast, look more akin to an nonlinear critical‐layer absorption scenario. LC2 exhibits region of largely undular PV contours adjacent to a nonlinear of irreversiby deformen PV contous. In the latter region PV rearrangement, and hence absorption of Rossby‐wave activity, has largely ceased. This accounts for the more persistent EKEE in the LC2 case.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.49711950903

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 842

Metadata

Authors
Thorncroft, C. D., Hoskins, B. J., & McIntyre, M. E.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-01
Volume
119
Issue
509
Pages
17-55
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2005904805
Cited by
842
References
0
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two paradigms of baroclinic‐wave life‐cycle behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49711950903
The paper
Thorncroft, C. D., Hoskins, B. J., & McIntyre, M. E. (1993). Two paradigms of baroclinic‐wave life‐cycle behaviour. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711950903

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.