Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 547

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Atmosphere‐ocean thermal coupling in the North Atlantic: A positive feedback

Watanabe, M., Kimoto, M.·2000·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

In this article, it is examined whether a positive atmosphere‐ocean feedback is found over the North Atlantic through a series of general circulation model (GCM) experiments. A 60‐year integration of an atmospheric GCM (AGCM) coupled with a 50 m deep motionless ocean was conducted. The coupled run was compared with two uncoupled runs, one with prescribed mid‐latitude climato‐logical sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and the other with daily SSTs derived from the coupled experiment. The uncoupled atmosphere forces the slab ocean, to obtain SST responses in these runs. Consistent with previous studies, the coupled atmosphere‐ocean fields show interannual variances larger than those in the uncoupled runs, due to reduction in the local thermal damping. Patterns of maximum atmosphere‐ocean covariability show the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and tripole SST anomalies both in the coupled and uncoupled fields, indicating a dominant role of the atmosphere in generating the SST anomalies. On the other hand, analyses of the temporal variability in the three runs suggest an active role of SST anomalies in determining the polarity of the air‐sea coupled variability longer than the interannual time‐scale. A combined analysis of forcing SST, upper‐air height, and the response SST anomalies in the uncoupled run identified that a patch of positive SST anomalies in the mid‐latitude band around 40°N effectively excite the positive phase of the NAO, which in turn reinforces the tripole SST anomalies. This relationship was further confirmed by a nine‐member ensemble AGCM experiment forced by the relevant SST anomalies. Since the forcing and response SST anomaly patterns bear some resemblance, these results manifest positive feedback at work in the coupled atmosphere‐ocean patterns. The processes responsible for this positive feedback were elaborated by a series of linear model experiments. The local thermal adjustment of the atmosphere to the SST anomalies results in increased precipitation over the Gulf Stream region. Associated diabatic heating applied to a linear baroclinic model yields a positive height response to the east, which highly influences the southern part of the NAO. This stationary response in turn induces a northward deflection in the storm track activity, leading to an eddy vorticity feedback that tends to force the positive phase of the NAO.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.49712657017

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 547

Metadata

Authors
Watanabe, M., & Kimoto, M.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-10
Volume
126
Issue
570
Pages
3343-3369
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2150420915
Cited by
547
References
0
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmosphere‐ocean thermal coupling in the North Atlantic: A positive feedback. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49712657017
The paper
Watanabe, M., & Kimoto, M. (2000). Atmosphere‐ocean thermal coupling in the North Atlantic: A positive feedback. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712657017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.