The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear data assimilation in geosciences: an extremely efficient particle filter
Open accessAbstract
Almost all research fields in geosciences use numerical models and observations and combine these using data‐assimilation techniques. With ever‐increasing resolution and complexity, the numerical models tend to be highly nonlinear and also observations become more complicated and their relation to the models more nonlinear. Standard data‐assimilation techniques like (ensemble) Kalman filters and variational methods like 4D‐Var rely on linearizations and are likely to fail in one way or another. Nonlinear data‐assimilation techniques are available, but are only efficient for small‐dimensional problems, hampered by the so‐called ‘curse of dimensionality’. Here we present a fully nonlinear particle filter that can be applied to higher dimensional problems by exploiting the freedom of the proposal density inherent in particle filtering. The method is illustrated for the three‐dimensional Lorenz model using three particles and the much more complex 40‐dimensional Lorenz model using 20 particles. By also applying the method to the 1000‐dimensional Lorenz model, again using only 20 particles, we demonstrate the strong scale‐invariance of the method, leading to the optimistic conjecture that the method is applicable to realistic geophysical problems. Copyright © 2010 Royal Meteorological Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 · Cited by 6,474
Evensen, G. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc00572 · Cited by 5,371
Cited by
Towards neural Earth system modelling by integrating artificial intelligence in Earth system science
Irrgang, C., Boers, N., Sonnewald, M., Barnes, E. A., Kadow, C., Staneva, J., & Saynisch-Wagner, J. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00374-3 · Cited by 308
Estimating Model Parameters with Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation: A Review
RUIZ, J. J., PULIDO, M., & MIYOSHI, T. (2013) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II · doi:10.2151/jmsj.2013-201 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- van Leeuwen, P. J.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 653
- Pages
- 1991-1999
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2134255235
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear data assimilation in geosciences: an extremely efficient particle filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.699
- The paper
- van Leeuwen, P. J. (2010). Nonlinear data assimilation in geosciences: an extremely efficient particle filter. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.