The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimentation with different thermodynamic cycles used for p Ka calculations on carboxylic acids using complete basis set and Gaussian‐n models combined with CPCM continuum solvation methods
Abstract
Complete basis set and Gaussian‐n methods were combined with Barone and Cossi's implementation of the polarizable conductor model (CPCM) continuum solvation methods to calculate p Ka values for six carboxylic acids. Four different thermodynamic cycles were considered in this work. An experimental value of −264.61 kcal/mol for the free energy of solvation of H+, Δ Gs(H+), was combined with a value for Ggas(H+) of −6.28 kcal/mol, to calculate p Ka values with cycle 1. The complete basis set gas‐phase methods used to calculate gas‐phase free energies are very accurate, with mean unsigned errors of 0.3 kcal/mol and standard deviations of 0.4 kcal/mol. The CPCM solvation calculations used to calculate condensed‐phase free energies are slightly less accurate than the gas‐phase models, and the best method has a mean unsigned error and standard deviation of 0.4 and 0.5 kcal/mol, respectively. Thermodynamic cycles that include an explicit water in the cycle are not accurate when the free energy of solvation of a water molecule is used, but appear to become accurate when the experimental free energy of vaporization of water is used. This apparent improvement is an artifact of the standard state used in the calculation. Geometry relaxation in solution does not improve the results when using these later cycles. The use of cycle 1 and the complete basis set models combined with the CPCM solvation methods yielded p Ka values accurate to less than half a p Ka unit. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2001
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the structure and thermodynamics of solvated monoatomic ions using a hybrid solvation model
Topol, I. A., Tawa, G. J., Burt, S. K., & Rashin, A. A. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.480486 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Basicity of Nucleophilic Carbenes in Aqueous and Nonaqueous SolventsTheoretical Predictions
Magill, A. M., Cavell, K. J., & Yates, B. F. (2004) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja038973x · Cited by 451
Kelly, C. P., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp055336f · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Liptak, M. D., & Shields, G. C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 727-741
- ISSN
- 0020-7608 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-461X
- OpenAlex
- W2128951011
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimentation with different thermodynamic cycles used for p Ka calculations on carboxylic acids using complete basis set and Gaussian‐n models combined with CPCM continuum solvation methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qua.1703
- The paper
- Liptak, M. D., & Shields, G. C. (2001). Experimentation with different thermodynamic cycles used for p Ka calculations on carboxylic acids using complete basis set and Gaussian‐n models combined with CPCM continuum solvation methods. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.1703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.