The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global optimization of clusters using electronic structure methods
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decade, there has been a significant growth in the development and application of methods for performing global optimization (GO) of cluster and nanoparticle structures using first‐principles electronic structure methods coupled to sophisticated search algorithms. This has in part been driven by the desire to avoid the use of empirical potentials (EPs), especially in cases where no reliable potentials exist to guide the search toward reasonable regions of configuration space. This has been facilitated by improvements in the reliability of the search algorithms, increased efficiency of the electronic structure methods, and the development of faster, multiprocessor high‐performance computing architectures. In this review, we give a brief overview of GO algorithms, though concentrating mainly on genetic algorithm and basin hopping techniques, first in combination with EPs. The major part of the review then deals with details of the implementation and application of these search methods to allow exploration for global minimum cluster structures directly using electronic structure methods and, in particular, density functional theory. Example applications are presented, ranging from isolated monometallic and bimetallic clusters to molecular clusters and ligated and surface supported metal clusters. Finally, some possible future developments are highlighted. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Nanoalloys: From Theory to Applications of Alloy Clusters and Nanoparticles
Ferrando, R., Jellinek, J., & Johnston, R. L. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040090g · Cited by 3,690
Self-citationGaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403 · Cited by 3,242
All-boron aromatic clusters as potential new inorganic ligands and building blocks in chemistry
Alexandrova, A. N., Boldyrev, A. I., Zhai, H.-J., & Wang, L.-S. (2006) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.032 · Cited by 712
Cited by
From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Genetic algorithms for computational materials discovery accelerated by machine learning
Jennings, P. C., Lysgaard, S., Hummelshøj, J. S., Vegge, T., & Bligaard, T. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0181-4 · Cited by 269
Machine learning in materials design: Algorithm and application*
Song, Z., Chen, X., Meng, F., Cheng, G., Wang, C., Sun, Z., & Yin, W.-J. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abc0e3 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Heiles, S., & Johnston, R. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-19
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2091-2109
- ISSN
- 0020-7608 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-461X
- OpenAlex
- W2032459813
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global optimization of clusters using electronic structure methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qua.24462
- The paper
- Heiles, S., & Johnston, R. L. (2013). Global optimization of clusters using electronic structure methods. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.24462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.