The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous‐Variable Quantum Key Distribution with Gaussian Modulation—The Theory of Practical Implementations
Open accessAbstract
Quantum key distribution (QKD) using weak coherent states and homodyne detection is a promising candidate for practical quantum‐cryptographic implementations due to its compatibility with existing telecom equipment and high detection efficiencies. However, despite the actual simplicity of the protocol, the security analysis of this method is rather involved compared to discrete‐variable QKD. This article reviews the theoretical foundations of continuous‐variable quantum key distribution (CV‐QKD) with Gaussian modulation and rederives the essential relations from scratch in a pedagogical way. The aim of this paper is to be as comprehensive and self‐contained as possible in order to be well intelligible even for readers with little pre‐knowledge on the subject. Although the present article is a theoretical discussion of CV‐QKD, its focus lies on practical implementations, taking into account various kinds of hardware imperfections and suggesting practical methods to perform the security analysis subsequent to the key exchange. Apart from a review of well‐known results, this manuscript presents a set of new original noise models which are helpful to get an estimate of how well a given set of hardware will perform in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515 · cited 2×
“nd that a fraction of the symbols is used for error estimation we obtain the asymptotic secure-key fraction of a practical CV-QKD system [15]:3 rasympt coll (1 FER)(1 )(I AB ˜ EB): (2.5) Here FER 2[0;1] and 2[0;1] represent the frame-error rate and the eciency of information reconciliation, respectively, and 2[0;1] is…”
InfluentialQuantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436
Wilde, M. M. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139525343 · Cited by 1,138
Cited by
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
Metadata
- Authors
- Laudenbach, F., Pacher, C., Fung, C. F., Poppe, A., Peev, M., Schrenk, B., Hentschel, M., Walther, P., & Hübel, H.
- Venue
- Advanced Quantum Technologies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-26
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2511-9044 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2600990055
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous‐Variable Quantum Key Distribution with Gaussian Modulation—The Theory of Practical Implementations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qute.201800011
- The paper
- Laudenbach, F., Pacher, C., Fung, C. F., Poppe, A., Peev, M., Schrenk, B., Hentschel, M., Walther, P., & Hübel, H. (2018). Continuous‐Variable Quantum Key Distribution with Gaussian Modulation—The Theory of Practical Implementations. Advanced Quantum Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.201800011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.