In Vitro Metabolism of Metonitazene in Camels: High-Resolution Mass Spectrometric Characterization for Doping Control
Abstract
RATIONALE: Novel psychoactive substances, especially those within the benzimidazole class such as metonitazene, are powerful psychoactive agents with considerable potential for misuse in both human and animal sports. Implementing a robust detection and monitoring system is crucial to ensure fair competition and welfare of the athletes involved. METHODS: In vitro studies were conducted using camel liver homogenates to investigate the metabolism of metonitazene in camels. The metabolites were analyzed using a Thermo Fisher Orbitrap Exploris LC-MS system. Method validation for qualitative determination was performed using in-house developed methods, while data analysis and metabolite identification were performed using the Compound Discoverer software. RESULTS: A total of seven Phase I metabolites of metonitazene were successfully identified. The metabolic transformations were predominantly characterized by dealkylation reactions. These metabolites hold promise as potential markers for the long-term detection of metonitazene in camels for doping control applications. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the effectiveness of advanced high-resolution LC-MS techniques in identifying and characterizing the in vitro metabolites of metonitazene in camels. Considering the high potency and potential for abuse of metonitazene in camel racing, the metabolites identified offer a valuable basis for establishing robust doping control strategies. These results support the development of regulatory frameworks designed to protect animal welfare and uphold the integrity of the sport.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In some Arabic countries, nitazenes are used in camel racing as doping agents.
“In some Arabic countries, these compounds are used in camel racing as doping agents [65,66].”
From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [66]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Nalakath, J., Palathinkal, A. B., Naduvilakkandy, R., Vazhat, R. A., & Komathu, P. O.
- Affiliations
- Central Veterinary Research Laboratory (AE)
- Corresponding author
- Nalakath, Jahfar
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-07-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- e10111-e10111
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W4412689663
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
- Keywords
- in vitro metabolism, camels, doping control, new psychoactive substances, benzimidazole, phase I metabolites, dealkylation, metabolite identification, camel racing, animal welfare
- MeSH terms
- Amines, Animals, Camelus, Chromatography, Liquid, Doping in Sports, Liver, Mass Spectrometry, Substance Abuse Detection, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review