Cited by 3Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisDoping in SportsPharmacological Effects and Assays

In Vitro Metabolism of Metonitazene in Camels: High-Resolution Mass Spectrometric Characterization for Doping Control

Nalakath, Jahfar, Palathinkal, Ansar Babu, Naduvilakkandy, Rasheed, Vazhat, Ramees Abdulla, Komathu, Praseen Ondern·2025·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

RATIONALE: Novel psychoactive substances, especially those within the benzimidazole class such as metonitazene, are powerful psychoactive agents with considerable potential for misuse in both human and animal sports. Implementing a robust detection and monitoring system is crucial to ensure fair competition and welfare of the athletes involved. METHODS: In vitro studies were conducted using camel liver homogenates to investigate the metabolism of metonitazene in camels. The metabolites were analyzed using a Thermo Fisher Orbitrap Exploris LC-MS system. Method validation for qualitative determination was performed using in-house developed methods, while data analysis and metabolite identification were performed using the Compound Discoverer software. RESULTS: A total of seven Phase I metabolites of metonitazene were successfully identified. The metabolic transformations were predominantly characterized by dealkylation reactions. These metabolites hold promise as potential markers for the long-term detection of metonitazene in camels for doping control applications. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the effectiveness of advanced high-resolution LC-MS techniques in identifying and characterizing the in vitro metabolites of metonitazene in camels. Considering the high potency and potential for abuse of metonitazene in camel racing, the metabolites identified offer a valuable basis for establishing robust doping control strategies. These results support the development of regulatory frameworks designed to protect animal welfare and uphold the integrity of the sport.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.10111

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some Arabic countries, nitazenes are used in camel racing as doping agents.

    “In some Arabic countries, these compounds are used in camel racing as doping agents [65,66].”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 3

Authors
Nalakath, J., Palathinkal, A. B., Naduvilakkandy, R., Vazhat, R. A., & Komathu, P. O.
Affiliations
Central Veterinary Research Laboratory (AE)
Corresponding author
Nalakath, Jahfar
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-07-28
Volume
39
Issue
21
Pages
e10111-e10111
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W4412689663
Cited by
3
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
in vitro metabolism, camels, doping control, new psychoactive substances, benzimidazole, phase I metabolites, dealkylation, metabolite identification, camel racing, animal welfare
MeSH terms
Amines, Animals, Camelus, Chromatography, Liquid, Doping in Sports, Liver, Mass Spectrometry, Substance Abuse Detection, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review