Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Small volume and low flow‐rate electrospray lonization mass spectrometry of aqueous samples

Open access
Gale, David C., Smith, Richard D.·1993·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

A new electrospray ionization source (emitter) has been developed which allows the effective utilization of very small sample volumes at much lower flow rates than previously demonstrated. A small diameter etcched‐tip capillary has been incorporated into a pressure‐infusion electrospray ionization source. The ability to electro‐spray aqueous solutions without the use of an ancillary sheath flow is demonstrated with several biopolymers. High signal intensities and stable signals are observed for this source in a comparison with a standard methanol‐sheath source.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.1290071111

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Gale, D. C., & Smith, R. D.
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-11
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
1017-1021
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W2057954468
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small volume and low flow‐rate electrospray lonization mass spectrometry of aqueous samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.1290071111
The paper
Gale, D. C., & Smith, R. D. (1993). Small volume and low flow‐rate electrospray lonization mass spectrometry of aqueous samples. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1290071111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.