Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantification of antiretroviral drugs in dried blood spot samples by means of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

Koal, Therese, Burhenne, Heike, Römling, Regina, Svoboda, Michal, Resch, Klaus, Kaever, Volkhard·2005·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

For the first time approved antiretroviral drugs, i.e. protease inhibitors (PI) and non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), were quantified in dried blood spots (DBS) from HIV/AIDS patient whole blood samples as the basis for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by a robust simultaneous liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. This study included seven PI (amprenavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, lopinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, atazanavir) and two NNRTI (nevirapine, efavirenz). LC/MS/MS coupling was realized using a Phenomenex® Synergy Max RP LC column (150 × 2 mm, 4 µ) in combination with a tandem mass spectrometer (API 2000, Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex Concord) operating in positive and negative multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with reserpine as internal standard. DBS samples were punched out and extracted with 50:50 MeOH/0.2 M ZnSO 4 (v/v) as extraction reagent. The method performance data for the drugs in DBS like limits of detection (LOD, 8–70 ng/mL), lower limits of quantification (LLOQ, 41–102 ng/mL), linearity (R 2 , 0.9981–0.9999), linear concentration ranges (41–10.000 ng/mL), accuracies (92–113%), recoveries (62–94%), and ion suppression were investigated and are comparable to data obtained from human plasma, which is the current standard matrix for TDM of PI and NNRTI. In this case, off‐line plasma sample preparation was performed by means of simple protein precipitation with 80:20 methanol/0.2 M ZnSO 4 (v/v) as precipitation reagent. Significant correlations between real patient plasma and DBS were obtained for samples containing lopinavir, atazanavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and efavirenz. DBS preparation as sampling alternative is well suited and practicable for TDM minimizing the high infection risk of HIV/AIDS samples and may facilitate sample mailing. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.2158

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Koal, T., Burhenne, H., Römling, R., Svoboda, M., Resch, K., & Kaever, V.
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-29
Volume
19
Issue
21
Pages
2995-3001
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W2024773741
Cited by
207
References
0
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of antiretroviral drugs in dried blood spot samples by means of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.2158
The paper
Koal, T., Burhenne, H., Römling, R., Svoboda, M., Resch, K., & Kaever, V. (2005). Quantification of antiretroviral drugs in dried blood spot samples by means of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2158

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.