The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the powers of powerful knowledge
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore and clarify the idea of ‘powerful knowledge’ as a sociological concept and as a curriculum principle. The paper seeks to clarify its conceptual basis and to make its meaning and the arguments it implies, less ambiguous and less open to misunderstanding. This will enable us to suggest some of the research and policy options that it opens up. The paper begins with a brief discussion of the origins of the contemporary usage of the concept in the sociology of education and its explains its roots in the often neglected sociology of knowledge of Emile Durkheim. We draw from Durkheim the idea that ‘powerful knowledge’ is differentiated and specialised knowledge and trace this argument through the work of Vygotsky and, in more detail, of Basil Bernstein. Following Bernstein's analysis of the different forms that specialised knowledge can take, we consider the curriculum implications of the view that some forms, the STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) subjects, are ‘intrinsically more powerful than others’. We indicate the limits of this argument and in the final section suggest how the idea of powerful knowledge can be more broadly conceived to include the arts and humanities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The division of labor in society
Durkheim, É. (1935) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.4324/9780429499838-5 · Cited by 5,156
The Elementary Forms of Religious Life
Durkheim, E., & Swain, J. W. (1916) · The American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3405938 · Cited by 3,400
On the Division of Labor in Society
Gehlke, C. E., Durkheim, E., & Simpson, G. (1935) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1116093 · Cited by 3,219
After Virtue; A Study in Moral Theory
Struever, N. S., & MacIntyre, A. (1981) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2906250 · Cited by 2,669
Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life
Cohen, I. B., Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1987) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1869945 · Cited by 2,151
Collingwood, R. G. (1946) · Cited by 1,840
The Normal and the Pathological
Kaye, H. L., Canguilhem, G., Fawcett, C. R., & Cohen, R. S. (1990) · Journal of Interdisciplinary History · doi:10.2307/204931 · Cited by 1,595
Shapin, S. (2018) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226398488.001.0001 · Cited by 1,587
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001 · Cited by 1,503
Science of Science and Reflexivity
Bourdıeu, P. (2004) · Cited by 1,432
Cited by
Poulton, P., & Mockler, N. (2024) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1002/curj.225 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, M., & Muller, J.
- Venue
- Review of Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-250
- ISSN
- 2049-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089744321
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 47.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the powers of powerful knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rev3.3017
- The paper
- Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.