Cited by 3Reproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Health and Technologies

Prediction of pregnancy after frozen-thawed embryo transfer via in vivo intrauterine oxidation-reduction potential measurements: A pilot study

Open access
Nakamura, Hitomi, Hosono, Takayoshi, Taniguchi, Takeshi, Kumasawa, Keiichi, Goa, Satoko, Ono, Masaaki, Kimura, Tadashi·2018·Reproductive Medicine and Biology

Abstract

PURPOSE: During the implantation period, the uterus goes through many complex, orchestrated changes, including alterations of the glycocalyx that are due to sialylation, sulfation, and fucosylation. A previous mouse study showed that the in vivo intrauterine oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) aided in determining the alterations in the uterine endometrium that are suitable for implantation and for evaluating prospective uterine receptivity, while the in vivo intrauterine pH did not. It was assessed if the in vivo intrauterine ORP could be a useful parameter to predict pregnancy in women. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted for patients who had received a frozen-thawed single embryo transfer in a programmed, hormonally controlled cycle. The in vivo intrauterine ORP was measured 3 times during the treatment cycle, at cycle days 9-10, 1 day before progesterone administration and immediately before the embryo transfer. RESULTS: The amount of in vivo intrauterine ORP at 9-10 days after the start of menstrual bleeding was significantly lower in the pregnant group than in the non-pregnant group. A receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis of the intrauterine ORP as a predictor of non-conception showed an area under the curve of 0.80. CONCLUSION: The in vivo intrauterine ORP could be a useful parameter to predict pregnancy for the frozen-thawed embryo transfer treatment cycle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rmb2.12098

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment‐seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 1506‐ 1512. 17376819
  2. [2]Anderson TL, Olson GE, Hoffman LH. Stage‐specific alterations in the apical membrane glycoproteins of endometrial epithelial cells related to implantation in rabbits. Biol Reprod. 1986; 34: 701‐ 720. 3708052
  3. [3]Morris JE, Potter SW, Gaza‐Bulseco G. Estradiol‐stimulated turnover of heparin sulfate proteoglycan in mouse uterine epithelium. J Biol Chem. 1988; 263: 4712‐ 4718. 2965148
  4. [4]Kubushiro K, Kojima K, Mikami M, et al. Menstrual cycle‐associated alteration of sulfogalactosylceramide in human uterine endometrium: possible induction of glycolipid sulfation by sex steroid hormones. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1989; 268: 129‐ 136. 2912372
  5. [5]Zhu Z, Deng H, Fenderson BA, Nudelman ED, Tsui Z. Glycosphingolipids of human myometrium and endometrium and their changes during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy and ageing. J Reprod Fertil. 1990; 88: 71‐ 79. 2313655
  6. [6]Zhu Z, Cheng L, Tsui Z, Hakomori S, Fenderson BA. Glycosphingolipids of rabbit endometrium and their changes during pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil. 1992; 95: 813‐ 823. 1404096
  7. [7]Bell SC, Patel SR, Kirwan PH, Drife JO. Protein synthesis and secretion by the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle and the effect of progesterone in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1986; 77: 221‐ 231. 3723470
  8. [8]Conroy CW, Tyma P, Daum PH, Erman JE. Oxidation‐reduction potential measurements of cytochrome c peroxidase and pH dependent spectral transitions in the ferrous enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978; 537: 62‐ 69. 31188
  9. [9]Nakamura H, Hosono T, Kumasawa K, Kimura T. Prospective evaluation of uterine receptivity in mice. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017;. 10.1071/RD17209 [Epub ahead of print]. 28941468 · DOI
  10. [10]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Female age‐related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 719‐ 721. 24553169
  11. [11]Broughton DE, Moley KH. Obesity and female infertility: potential mediators of obesity's impact. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107: 840‐ 847. 28292619
  12. [12]Genbacev OD, Prakobphol A, Foulk RA, et al. Trophoblast L‐selectin‐mediated adhesion at the maternal‐fetal interface. Science. 2003; 299: 405‐ 408. 12532021
  13. [13]Fazleabas AT, Kim JJ. Development. What makes an embryo stick?. Science. 2003; 299: 355‐ 356. 12532005
  14. [14]Hewitt K, Beer AE, Grinnell F. Disappearance of anionic sites from the surface of the rat endometrial epithelium at the time of blastocyst implantation. Biol Reprod. 1979; 21: 691‐ 707. 40627
  15. [15]Morris JE, Potter SW. A comparison of developmental changes in surface charge in mouse blastocysts and uterine epithelium using DEAE beads and dextran sulfate in vitro. Dev Biol. 1984; 103: 190‐ 199. 6201405
  16. [16]World Health Organization. A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. III. Characteristics of the menstrual cycle and of the fertile phase. Fertil Steril. 1983; 40: 773‐ 778. 6360719
  17. [17]Small CM, Manatunga AK, Klein M, et al. Menstrual cycle characteristics: associations with fertility and spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology. 2006; 17: 52‐ 60. 16357595
  18. [18]Mikolajczyk RT, Louis GM, Cooney MA, Lynch CD, Sundaram R. Characteristics of prospectively measured vaginal bleeding among women trying to conceive. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010; 24: 24‐ 30. 20078826 PMC3422651
  19. [19]Wilcox AJ, Dunson DB, Weinberg CR, Trussell J, Baird DD. Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: providing benchmark rates for assessment of post‐coital contraceptives. Contraception. 2001; 63: 211‐ 215. 11376648
  20. [20]Sermon K, Capalbo A, Cohen J, et al. The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016; 22: 845‐ 857. 27256483 PMC4986417
  21. [21]Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 1796‐ 1799. 10362823

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakamura, H., Hosono, T., Taniguchi, T., Kumasawa, K., Goa, S., Ono, M., & Kimura, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Osaka Electro-Communication University (JP)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Taniguchi Hospital Izumisano Osaka Japan
Corresponding author
Nakamura, Hitomi
Venue
Reproductive Medicine and Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-23
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
255-261
ISSN
  • 1445-5781 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0578
OpenAlex
W2792315879
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Japan Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Tokyo, Japan (16K11086, 16K11087)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
frozen embryo transfer, pregnancy prediction, endometrial receptivity, embryo implantation, progesterone administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review