Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Model Predictive Control approach for guidance of spacecraft rendezvous and proximity maneuvering

Di Cairano, S., Park, H., Kolmanovsky, I.·2012·International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control

Abstract

SUMMARY: Traditionally, rendezvous and proximity maneuvers have been performed using open‐loop maneuver planning techniques and ad hoc error corrections. In this paper, a Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach is applied to spacecraft rendezvous and proximity maneuvering problems in the orbital plane. We demonstrate that various constraints arising in these maneuvers can be effectively handled with the MPC approach. These include constraints on thrust magnitude, constraints on spacecraft positioning within Line‐of‐Sight cone while approaching the docking port on a target platform, and constraints on approach velocity to match the velocity of the docking port. The two cases of a nonrotating and a rotating (tumbling) platform are treated separately, and trajectories are evaluated in terms of maneuver time and fuel consumption. For the case when the platform is not rotating and the docking port position is fixed with respect to the chosen frame, an explicit offline solution of the MPC optimization problem is shown to be possible; this explicit solution has a form of a piecewise affine control law suitable for online implementation without an on‐board optimizer. In the case of a fast rotating platform, it is, however, shown that the prediction of the platform rotation is necessary to successfully accomplish the maneuvers and to reduce fuel consumption. Finally, the proposed approach is applied to debris avoidance maneuvers with the debris in the spacecraft rendezvous path. The significance of this paper is in demonstrating that Model Predictive Control can be an effective feedback control approach to satisfy various maneuver requirements, reduce fuel consumption, and provide robustness to disturbances. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rnc.2827

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Metadata

Authors
Di Cairano, S., Park, H., & Kolmanovsky, I.
Venue
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-15
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
1398-1427
ISSN
  • 1049-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1239
OpenAlex
W1528431624
Cited by
273
References
29
FWCI
17.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model Predictive Control approach for guidance of spacecraft rendezvous and proximity maneuvering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rnc.2827
The paper
Di Cairano, S., Park, H., & Kolmanovsky, I. (2012). Model Predictive Control approach for guidance of spacecraft rendezvous and proximity maneuvering. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.2827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.