Cited by 30Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsControl Systems in Engineering

Adaptive neural tracking control for flexible joint robot including hydraulic actuator dynamics with disturbance observer

Open access
Phan, Van Du, Vo, Cong Phat, Ahn, Kyoung Kwan·2024·International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control

Abstract

In this paper, a disturbance observer‐based adaptive neural backstepping integral sliding mode control (BISMC) is developed for a flexible joint robot (FJR) with the integration of an adjustable stiffness rotary actuator (ASRA). This system suffers from unknown system dynamics, external disturbance, and the influence of variable stiffness, which is a challenge for achieving precision tracking performance. Considering the lumped disturbances in FJR generated by the hydraulic system and the stiffness modulation of the ASRA, we investigate the structural dynamics nonlinear model of the FJR system, including hydraulic actuator dynamics. While other linear control strategies are applied for the FJR, the proposed controller uses BISMC, neural networks (NN), and nonlinear disturbance observers to deal with the disadvantages mentioned above. Radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN) are designed to tackle unknown nonlinear functions, and the disturbance observers are introduced to compensate for the influence of the variable stiffness, disturbance, and the approximation error caused by NN. Simulations and experiments are independently implemented to demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed controller. Results exhibit that the integral absolute error‐index is reduced by 20.4% when the proposed method is deployed for the experiment with a multistep trajectory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rnc.7412

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ham R, Sugar T, Vanderborght B, Hollander K, Lefeber D. Compliant actuator designs. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2009;16(3):81-94.
  2. Mengacci R, Keppler M, Pfanne M, Bicchi A, Ott C. Elastic structure preserving control for compliant robots driven by agonistic-antagonistic actuators (ESPaa). IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2021;6(2):879-886.
  3. Choi H, Piao J, Kim ES, et al. Intuitive bilateral teleoperation of a cable-driven parallel robot controlled by a cable-driven parallel robot. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2020;18(7):1792-1805.
  4. Lee HD, Moon JI, Kang TH. Design of a Series Elastic Tendon Actuator Based on gait analysis for a walking assistance exosuit. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2019;17(11):2940-2947.
  5. Wolf S, Grioli G, Eiberger O, et al. Variable stiffness actuators: review on design and components. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2016;21(5):2418-2430.
  6. Sun J, Guo Z, Zhang Y, Xiao X, Tan J. A novel Design of Serial Variable Stiffness Actuator Based on an Archimedean spiral relocation mechanism. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2018;23(5):2121-2131.
  7. Vo CP, Phan VD, Nguyen TH, Ahn KK. A compact adjustable stiffness rotary actuator based on Linear Springs: working principle, design, and experimental verification. Actuators. 2020;9(4):141-156.
  8. Ba K-x et al. A nonlinear model-based variable impedance parameters control for position-based impedance control system of hydraulic drive unit. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2020;18(7):1806-1817.
  9. Thien TD, Ba DX, Ahn KK. Adaptive backstepping sliding mode control for equilibrium position tracking of an electrohydraulic elastic manipulator. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2020;67(5):3860-3869.
  10. Guo Q, Chen Z. Neural adaptive control of single-rod electrohydraulic system with lumped uncertainty. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;146:106869-106885.
  11. Phan VD, Vo CP, Dao HV, Ahn KK. Robust fault-tolerant control of an electro-hydraulic actuator with a novel nonlinear unknown input observer. IEEE Access. 2021;9:30750-30760.
  12. Florian Petit AD, Albu-Schäffer A. Backstepping control of variable stiffness robots. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2015;23(6):2195-2202.
  13. Sardellitti I, Medrano-Cerda GA, Tsagarakis N, Jafari A, Caldwell DG. Gain scheduling control for a class of variable stiffness actuators based on lever mechanisms. IEEE Trans Robot. 2013;29(3):791-798.
  14. Melchiorri GPAC, Luca AD. On the feedback linearization of robots with variable joint stiffness. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE; 2008;1753-1759.
  15. Psomopoulou E, Theodorakopoulos A, Doulgeri Z, Rovithakis GA. Prescribed performance tracking of a variable stiffness actuated robot. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2015;23(5):1914-1926.
  16. Yao J. Model-based nonlinear control of hydraulic servo systems: challenges, developments and perspectives. Front Mech Eng. 2017;13(2):179-210.
  17. Zhang L, Li Z, Yang C. Adaptive neural network based variable stiffness control of uncertain robotic systems using disturbance observer. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2017;64(3):2236-2245.
  18. Sun C, He W, Hong J. Neural network control of a flexible robotic manipulator using the lumped spring-Mass model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2017;47(8):1863-1874.
  19. Doukhi O, Lee DJ. Neural network-based robust adaptive certainty equivalent controller for quadrotor UAV with unknown disturbances. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2019;17(9):2365-2374.
  20. He W, Ouyang Y, Hong J. Vibration control of a flexible robotic manipulator in the presence of input Deadzone. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2017;13(1):48-59.
  21. Guo Z, Pan Y, Sun T, Zhang Y, Xiao X. Adaptive neural network control of serial variable stiffness actuators. Complexity. 2017;2017:5361246-5361254.
  22. Sunghoi Huh GT, Bicchi A. Neural network based robust adaptive control for a variable stiffness actuator. Proceedings of the 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation. 2008 1028-1034.
  23. Rahmani M, Rahman MH. Adaptive neural network fast fractional sliding mode control of a 7-DOF exoskeleton robot. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2019;18(1):124-133.
  24. Ren H, Ma H, Li H, Wang Z. Adaptive fixed-time control of nonlinear MASs with actuator faults. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sinica. 2023;10(5):1252-1262.
  25. Nguyen MN, Tran DT, Ahn KK. Robust position and vibration control of an electrohydraulic series elastic manipulator against disturbance generated by a variable stiffness actuator. Mechatronics. 2018;52:22-35.
  26. Zaare S, Soltanpour MR. Adaptive fuzzy global coupled nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control of n-rigid-link elastic-joint robot manipulators in presence of uncertainties. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2022;163:108165-108190.
  27. Mohammadi A, Tavakoli M, Marquez HJ, Hashemzadeh F. Nonlinear disturbance observer design for robotic manipulators. Control Eng Pract. 2013;21(3):253-267.
  28. Guo Z, Sun J, Ling J, Pan Y, Xiao X. Robust trajectory tracking control for variable stiffness actuators with model perturbations. Front Neurorobot. 2019;13:35-45.
  29. Guo J, Guo J, Xiao Z. Robust tracking control for two classes of variable stiffness actuators based on linear extended state observer with estimation error compensation. Int J Adv Robot Syst. 2020;17(2):1-9.
  30. Hua X, Huang D, Guo S. Extended state observer based on ADRC of linear system with incipient fault. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2019;18(6):1425-1434.
  31. Serio A, Grioli G, Sardellitti I, Tsagarakis NG, Bicchi A. A decoupled impedance observer for a variable stiffness robot. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE; 2011;5548-5553.
  32. Ma H, Ren H, Zhou Q, Li H, Wang Z. Observer-based neural control of N -link flexible-joint robots. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2022;35(4):5295-5305.
  33. Paine N, Oh S, Sentis L. Design and control considerations for high-performance series elastic actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2014;19(3):1080-1091.
  34. Kamalesh MS, Senthilnathan N, Bharatiraja C. Design of a Novel Boomerang Trajectory for sliding mode controller. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2020;18(11):2917-2928.
  35. Tuan LA, Cuong HM, Trieu PV, Nho LC, Thuan VD, Anh LV. Adaptive neural network sliding mode control of shipboard container cranes considering actuator backlash. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2018;112:233-250.
  36. Wen-Hua C, Ballance DJ, Gawthrop PJ, Reilly JO. A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2000;47(4):932-938.
  37. Khalil HK. Nonlinear Systems. Prentice Hall; 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phan, V. D., Vo, C. P., & Ahn, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Vinh University (VN)
  • Autonomous Robot 24Hours 7Days Co., Ltd Gyeonggi‐do South Korea
  • University of Ulsan (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Kyoung Kwan
Venue
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05-15
Volume
34
Issue
13
Pages
8744-8767
ISSN
  • 1049-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1239
OpenAlex
W4396975571
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministry of Education (2021RIS‐003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Control Systems in Engineering
Keywords
flexible joint robots, adaptive neural network control, disturbance observer, hydraulic actuator dynamics, radial basis function neural network, trajectory tracking control, lumped disturbance compensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review