The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Terramechanics‐based model for steering maneuver of planetary exploration rovers on loose soil
Abstract
This paper presents analytical models to investigate the steering maneuvers of planetary exploration rovers on loose soil. The models are based on wheel‐soil interaction mechanics, or terramechanics, with which the traction and disturbance forces of a wheel are evaluated for various slip conditions. These traction forces are decomposed into the longitudinal and lateral directions of the wheel. The latter component, termed the side force has a major influence in characterizing the steering maneuvers of the rover. In this paper, the wheel‐soil mechanics models are developed with particular attention to the side force and the validity of the model is confirmed by using a single‐wheel test bed. The motion profile of the entire rover is numerically evaluated by incorporating the wheel‐soil models into an articulated multibody model that describes the motion dynamics of the vehicle's body and chassis. Steering maneuvers are investigated under different steering angles by using a four‐wheel rover test bed on simulated lunar soil regolith simulant. The experimental results are compared with the simulation results using the corresponding model parameters. The proposed wheel‐and‐vehicle model demonstrates better accuracy in predicting steering maneuvers as compared to the conventional kinematics‐based model. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wong, J. Y. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119719984 · Cited by 2,864
Lunar sourcebook : a user's guide to the moon
Heiken, G. H., Vaniman, D. T., & French, B. M. (1991) · Cited by 809
Lunar sourcebook: a user's guide to the moon
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3868 · Cited by 224
Properties of Lunar Soil Simulant Manufactured in Japan
Kanamori, H., Udagawa, S., Yoshida, T., Matsumoto, S., & Takagi, K. (1998) · Space 98 · doi:10.1061/40339(206)53 · Cited by 179
Iagnemma, K. D., & Dubowsky, S. (2004) · Springer tracts in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/b94718 · Cited by 125
Motion dynamics of a rover with slip-based traction model
Yoshida, K., & Hamano, H. (2003) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/robot.2002.1013712 · Cited by 99
Self-citationEmergency Maneuvers of Autonomous Vehicles
Shiller, Z., & Sundar, S. (1996) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)58995-8 · Cited by 9
Cited by
Choosing the Best Locomotion Mode in Reconfigurable Rovers
Pérez del Pulgar Mancebo, C. J., Romeo Manrique, P., Paz Delgado, G. J., Sánchez Ibáñez, J. R., & Azkarate, M. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8070818 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishigami, G., Miwa, A., Nagatani, K., & Yoshida, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-250
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4967
- OpenAlex
- W1987424218
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 51.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.