Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 495

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Image Segmentation for Fruit Detection and Yield Estimation in Apple Orchards

Open access
Bargoti, Suchet, Underwood, James P.·2017·Journal of Field Robotics

Abstract

Ground vehicles equipped with monocular vision systems are a valuable source of high‐resolution image data for precision agriculture applications in orchards. This paper presents an image processing framework for fruit detection and counting using orchard image data. A general‐purpose image segmentation approach is used, including two feature learning algorithms; multiscale multilayered perceptrons (MLP) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). These networks were extended by including contextual information about how the image data was captured (metadata), which correlates with some of the appearance variations and/or class distributions observed in the data. The pixel‐wise fruit segmentation output is processed using the watershed segmentation (WS) and circular Hough transform (CHT) algorithms to detect and count individual fruits. Experiments were conducted in a commercial apple orchard near Melbourne, Australia. The results show an improvement in fruit segmentation performance with the inclusion of metadata on the previously benchmarked MLP network. We extend this work with CNNs, bringing agrovision closer to the state‐of‐the‐art in computer vision, where although metadata had negligible influence, the best pixel‐wise F1‐score of 0.791 was achieved. The WS algorithm produced the best apple detection and counting results, with a detection F1‐score of 0.861. As a final step, image fruit counts were accumulated over multiple rows at the orchard and compared against the post‐harvest fruit counts that were obtained from a grading and counting machine. The count estimates using CNN and WS resulted in the best performance for this data set, with a squared correlation coefficient of.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rob.21699

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 495

Metadata

Authors
Bargoti, S., & Underwood, J. P.
Venue
Journal of Field Robotics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-09
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1039-1060
ISSN
  • 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4967
OpenAlex
W2543665758
Cited by
495
References
5
FWCI
40.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image Segmentation for Fruit Detection and Yield Estimation in Apple Orchards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rob.21699
The paper
Bargoti, S., & Underwood, J. P. (2017). Image Segmentation for Fruit Detection and Yield Estimation in Apple Orchards. Journal of Field Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21699

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.