The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Image Segmentation for Fruit Detection and Yield Estimation in Apple Orchards
Open accessAbstract
Ground vehicles equipped with monocular vision systems are a valuable source of high‐resolution image data for precision agriculture applications in orchards. This paper presents an image processing framework for fruit detection and counting using orchard image data. A general‐purpose image segmentation approach is used, including two feature learning algorithms; multiscale multilayered perceptrons (MLP) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). These networks were extended by including contextual information about how the image data was captured (metadata), which correlates with some of the appearance variations and/or class distributions observed in the data. The pixel‐wise fruit segmentation output is processed using the watershed segmentation (WS) and circular Hough transform (CHT) algorithms to detect and count individual fruits. Experiments were conducted in a commercial apple orchard near Melbourne, Australia. The results show an improvement in fruit segmentation performance with the inclusion of metadata on the previously benchmarked MLP network. We extend this work with CNNs, bringing agrovision closer to the state‐of‐the‐art in computer vision, where although metadata had negligible influence, the best pixel‐wise F1‐score of 0.791 was achieved. The WS algorithm produced the best apple detection and counting results, with a detection F1‐score of 0.861. As a final step, image fruit counts were accumulated over multiple rows at the orchard and compared against the post‐harvest fruit counts that were obtained from a grading and counting machine. The count estimates using CNN and WS resulted in the best performance for this data set, with a squared correlation coefficient of.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
Learning Hierarchical Features for Scene Labeling
Farabet, C., Couprie, C., Najman, L., & LeCun, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.231 · Cited by 2,620
Cited by
Koirala, A., Walsh, K. B., Wang, Z., & McCarthy, C. (2019) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-019-09642-0 · Cited by 459
Automation in Agriculture by Machine and Deep Learning Techniques: A Review of Recent Developments
Saleem, M. H., Potgieter, J., & Arif, K. M. (2021) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-021-09806-x · Cited by 434
A Review of Convolutional Neural Network Applied to Fruit Image Processing
Naranjo-Torres, J., Mora, M., Hernández-García, R., Barrientos, R. J., Fredes, C., & Valenzuela, A. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10103443 · Cited by 406
A survey of public datasets for computer vision tasks in precision agriculture
Lu, Y., & Young, S. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105760 · Cited by 382
Convolutional Neural Networks for Image-Based High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review
Jiang, Y., & Li, C. (2020) · Plant Phenomics · doi:10.34133/2020/4152816 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Bargoti, S., & Underwood, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1039-1060
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4967
- OpenAlex
- W2543665758
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 40.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image Segmentation for Fruit Detection and Yield Estimation in Apple Orchards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rob.21699
- The paper
- Bargoti, S., & Underwood, J. P. (2017). Image Segmentation for Fruit Detection and Yield Estimation in Apple Orchards. Journal of Field Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.