The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations
Abstract
Many river restoration projects are focusing on restoring environmental flow regimes to improve ecosystem health in rivers that have been developed for water supply, hydropower generation, flood control, navigation, and other purposes. In efforts to prevent future ecological damage, water supply planners in some parts of the world are beginning to address the water needs of river ecosystems proactively by reserving some portion of river flows for ecosystem support. These restorative and protective actions require development of scientifically credible estimates of environmental flow needs. This paper describes an adaptive, inter‐disciplinary, science‐based process for developing environmental flow recommendations. It has been designed for use in a variety of water management activities, including flow restoration projects, and can be tailored according to available time and resources for determining environmental flow needs. The five‐step process includes: (1) an orientation meeting; (2) a literature review and summary of existing knowledge about flow‐dependent biota and ecological processes of concern; (3) a workshop to develop ecological objectives and initial flow recommendations, and identify key information gaps; (4) implementation of the flow recommendations on a trial basis to test hypotheses and reduce uncertainties; and (5) monitoring system response and conducting further research as warranted. A range of recommended flows are developed for the low flows in each month, high flow pulses throughout the year, and floods with targeted inter‐annual frequencies. We describe an application of this process to the Savannah River, in which the resultant flow recommendations were incorporated into a comprehensive river basin planning process conducted by the Corps of Engineers, and used to initiate the adaptive management of Thurmond Dam. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
OLDEN, J. D., & NAIMAN, R. J. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02179.x · Cited by 965
Ridoutt, B. G., & Pfister, S. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.08.003 · Cited by 632
Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments
(2014) · doi:10.5194/hess-18-5041-2014 · Cited by 513
Life history theory predicts fish assemblage response to hydrologic regimes
Mims, M. C., & Olden, J. D. (2012) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/11-0370.1 · Cited by 325
Are large‐scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems?
Olden, J. D., Konrad, C. P., Melis, T. S., Kennard, M. J., Freeman, M. C., Mims, M. C., Bray, E. N., Gido, K. B., Hemphill, N. P., Lytle, D. A., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/130076 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Richter, B. D., Warner, A. T., Meyer, J. L., & Lutz, K.
- Venue
- River Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-16
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-318
- ISSN
- 1535-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-1467
- OpenAlex
- W2013871107
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rra.892
- The paper
- Richter, B. D., Warner, A. T., Meyer, J. L., & Lutz, K. (2006). A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.892
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.