The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Roughly balanced bagging for imbalanced data
Abstract
The class imbalance problem appears in many real‐world applications of classification learning. We propose an ensemble algorithm “Roughly Balanced (RB) Bagging” using a novel sampling technique to improve the original bagging algorithm for data sets with skewed class distributions. For this sampling method, the number of samples in the largest and smallest classes are different, but they are effectively balanced when averaged over all of the subsets, which supports the approach of bagging in a more appropriate way. Individual models in RB Bagging tend to show larger diversity, which is one of the keys of ensemble models, compared with existing bagging‐based methods for imbalanced data that use exactly the same number of majority and minority examples for every training subset. In addition, the proposed method makes full use of all of the minority examples by under‐sampling, which is efficiently done by using negative binomial distributions. Numerical experiments using benchmark and real‐world data sets demonstrate that RB Bagging shows better performance than the existing “balanced” methods and other common methods for area under the ROC curve (AUC), which is a widely used metric in the class imbalance problem. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 2: 412‐426, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
Bradley, A. P. (1997) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(96)00142-2 · Cited by 7,217
Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy
Kuncheva, L. I., & Whitaker, C. J. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022859003006 · Cited by 2,335
Cost-sensitive learning by cost-proportionate example weighting
Zadrozny, B., Langford, J., & Abe, N. (2004) · Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2003.1250950 · Cited by 680
Cited by
Sample Subset Optimization for Classifying Imbalanced Biological Data
Yang, P., Zhang, Z., Zhou, B. B., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20847-8_28 · Cited by 31
Prediction of DNA i-motifs via machine learning
Yang, B., Guneri, D., Yu, H., Wright, E. P., Chen, W., Waller, Z. A. E., & Ding, Y. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae092 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Hido, S., Kashima, H., & Takahashi, Y.
- Venue
- Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-19
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 412-426
- ISSN
- 1932-1864 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-1872
- OpenAlex
- W2616891418
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Roughly balanced bagging for imbalanced data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sam.10061
- The paper
- Hido, S., Kashima, H., & Takahashi, Y. (2009). Roughly balanced bagging for imbalanced data. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.10061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.