The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding
Open accessAbstract
A large literature exists in which scientists describe their field as beautiful and the work they do as inspiring and passionate. Science teaching should strive to foster learning of substantive and powerful science ideas in ways that connect to the beauty inherent in those ideas. Our conception of learning science, that of learning for aesthetic understanding, achieves this goal by building on a framework of aesthetic experiences proposed by Dewey. This study is an articulation of the major components of aesthetic understanding, pedagogy designed to foster it, and the results of a pilot study designed to investigate its effectiveness. Responses to a survey and a semistructured interview are compared for students in two, fourth grade classrooms. The instructional goals were different in each classroom; one taught for the goal of aesthetic understanding, the second for the goal of conceptual understanding. Survey results indicate that the pedagogical moves were effective in scaffolding aesthetic understanding in treatment class students. More interesting, however, are student reports of the quality of the learning experience in the treatment class. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 87:574–587, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.1054
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187
Cited by
Motivation Interventions in Education: A Meta-Analytic Review
Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315617832 · Cited by 607
Creativity in Science Education: Perspectives and Challenges for Developing School Science
Kind, P. M., & Kind, V. (2007) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260708560225 · Cited by 276
Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20463 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-06
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 574-587
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2152356618
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.1054
- The paper
- Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.