The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teamwork in group model building
Abstract
Ongoing research at the Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy is focusing on strategies for efficient and effective model building in groups. The intent is to involve a relatively large client group in the business of model formulation. Recent projects have explored strategies for accelerated group model building in the context of three public policy problem areas: foster care in New York State, Medicaid costs in the state of Vermont, and homelessness policy initiatives in New York City. Five roles appear to be essential to support effective group model building: the facilitator, the modeler/ reflector, the process coach, the recorder, and the gate keeper. This article identifies the five roles, briefly discusses the problem areas, sketches the design of the group model‐building efforts, and hypothesizes principles and strategies to guide future group model building.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007 · Cited by 1,354
Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies
Powell, B. J., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., Aarons, G. A., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., & Mandell, D. S. (2017) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6 · Cited by 967
Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management
Basco-Carrera, L., Warren, A., van Beek, E., Jonoski, A., & Giardino, A. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.014 · Cited by 295
Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support
Andersen, D. F., Vennix, J. A. M., Richardson, G. P., & Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2007) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602339 · Cited by 288
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, G. P., & Andersen, D. F.
- Venue
- System Dynamics Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-137
- ISSN
- 0883-7066 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1727
- OpenAlex
- W2142020613
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teamwork in group model building. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sdr.4260110203
- The paper
- Richardson, G. P., & Andersen, D. F. (1995). Teamwork in group model building. System Dynamics Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260110203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.