Cited by 16Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCoding theory and cryptographyCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cryptanalysis of MICKEY family of stream ciphers

Ding, Lin, Guan, Jie·2013·Security and Communication Networks

Abstract

MICKEY 2.0 is a synchronous hardware‐oriented stream cipher designed by Steve Babbage and Matthew Dodd in 2006. It was submitted to eSTREAM and became one of the seven eSTREAM finalists. MICKEY‐128 2.0 is a variant version with 128‐bit secret key. In this paper, we present a weakness in the initialization of MICKEY family of stream ciphers (i.e., MICKEY 2.0 and MICKEY‐128 2.0). With this weakness, we apply a slide resynchronization attack to them, which finds for any K with k0 = d and for any IV with ivn = d, there is a (K′, IV′) pair with probability 2− 1 that generates 1‐bit shifted keystream, where d ∈ {0, 1} is a constant. Furthermore, we propose related key attacks on MICKEY family of stream ciphers. Our attacks can break these two ciphers in real time on a PC when 65 and 113 related (K, IV) pairs for MICKEY 2.0 and MICKEY‐128 2.0 are obtained, respectively. The success probabilities of our attacks on MICKEY 2.0 and MICKEY‐1282.0 are 0.9835 and 0.9714, respectively. This is the first paper presenting a weakness in MICKEY family of stream ciphers, and the results show that MICKEY family of stream ciphers are extremely weak against related key attacks. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sec.637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Hong J, 2005, INDOCRYPT 2005, LNCS 3797, 169
  2. 10.1515/jmc.2011.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00203965 · DOI
  4. Jakimoski G, 2004, SAC 2004, LNCS 3006, 208
  5. Kelsey J, 1996, CRYPTO 1996, LNCS 1109, 237
  6. Kelsey J, 1997, ICICS 1997, LNCS 1334, 233
  7. Bellare M, 2003, EUROCRYPT 2003, LNCS 2656, 491
  8. Lucks S, 2004, FSE 2004, LNCS 3017, 359
  9. Sekar G, 2007, INDOCRYPT 2007, LNCS 4859, 58
  10. De Cannire C, 2008, AFRICACRYPT 2008, LNCS 5023, 276
  11. Lee Y, 2008, ACISP 2008, LNCS 5107, 321
  12. 10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0033 · DOI
  13. Ding L, 2011, Related‐key chosen IV attack on K2, Chinese Journal of Electronics, 20, 365
  14. Ding L, 2012, Related‐key chosen IV attack on Decim v2 and Decim‐128, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 55, 123

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ding, L., & Guan, J.
Affiliations
Information Science and Technology Institute Zhengzhou China
Venue
Security and Communication Networks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-10
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
936-941
ISSN
  • 1939-0114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0122
OpenAlex
W1942692615
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Security and Communication Networks (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
cryptanalysis, related-key attacks, eSTREAM, keystream generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review