The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bridging Behavioral Models and Theoretical Concepts: Effectuation and Bricolage in the Opportunity Creation Framework
Open accessAbstract
Research summary: Opportunity creation, effectuation, and bricolage are three concepts that describe value creation and the central role of entrepreneurial action in that process. Although research often conceptualizes these concepts as interrelated, precisely how they relate to and complement one another and where they diverge remains unclear. This article examines the roots of each of these concepts and their underlying assumptions, organizing them within a unifying conceptual frame. Our analysis reveals a set of entailing implications that can guide future conceptual and empirical work in entrepreneurship, and it advances our understanding of value creation and capture in strategy, organization theory, management, and related fields. Managerial summary: What are entrepreneurs doing? At the highest level of abstraction, entrepreneurs are identifying and exploiting opportunities. Recently, several lines of research have examined how certain types of entrepreneurial action can result in forming, rather than merely encountering, opportunities. Scholars engaged in this work have used both deductive and observational approaches, which have been rarely examined jointly or integrated into a comprehensive framework. This article focuses on the literature on opportunity creation, effectuation, and bricolage, examining each of the approaches and their underlying assumptions, and it organizes them within a unifying conceptual frame. Doing so reveals avenues for future work, in particular the development of new theories of opportunity formation, and implications for research in related fields such as strategic management, organization theory, and economics. Copyright © 2016 Strategic Management Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Knight, F. H. (1921) · Cited by 9,948
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329 · Cited by 4,060
“Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question
Gartner, W. B. (1988) · American Journal of Small Business · doi:10.1177/104225878801200401 · Cited by 3,378
Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition
Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003464 · Cited by 2,824
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(96)00003-1 · Cited by 2,618
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259121 · Cited by 2,543
Metadata
- Authors
- Welter, C., Mauer, R., & Wuebker, R. J.
- Venue
- Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-20
- ISSN
- 1932-4391 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-443X
- OpenAlex
- W2283952780
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 43.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridging Behavioral Models and Theoretical Concepts: Effectuation and Bricolage in the Opportunity Creation Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sej.1215
- The paper
- Welter, C., Mauer, R., & Wuebker, R. J. (2016). Bridging Behavioral Models and Theoretical Concepts: Effectuation and Bricolage in the Opportunity Creation Framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.