The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation
Open accessAbstract
Strategic entrepreneurship refers to firms' pursuit of superior performance via simultaneous opportunity‐seeking and advantage‐seeking activities. Both small and large firms face impediments while pursuing strategic entrepreneurship. While small firms' opportunity‐seeking skills may be strong, their limited knowledge stocks and lack of market power inhibit their ability to enact the competitive advantages necessary to appropriate value from opportunities the firms choose to pursue. In contrast, large firms are skilled at establishing competitive advantages, but their heavy emphasis on the efficiency of their existing businesses often undermines their ability to continuously explore for additional opportunities. Building on a variety of theories, including network, learning, resource‐based, and real options, we suggest that collaborative innovation can enable both types of firms to overcome their respective challenges. Collaborative innovation is the pursuit of innovations across firm boundaries through the sharing of ideas, knowledge, expertise, and opportunities. For small firms, we contend that pursuing entrepreneurship collaboratively allows them to preserve their creativity and flexibility while mitigating the inherent liabilities of smallness. We argue that collaborative innovation permits large firms to exploit their advantage‐creating skills while concurrently exploring for opportunities outside their current domain. Thus, small and large firms that learn how to integrate strategic entrepreneurship and collaborative innovation are well positioned to create wealth. Copyright © 2008 Strategic Management Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Determinants of corporate borrowing
Myers, S. C. (1977) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(77)90015-0 · Cited by 13,169
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
An introduction to cybernetics
Ashby, W. R. (1956) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.5851 · Cited by 7,578
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 1×
“Second, network-based studies indicate the types of collaborative innovation approaches that are likely to lead to successful outcomes (e.g., Hansen, 1999; Tsai and Ghoshal, 1998).”
BackgroundCommunities of Practice and Social Learning Systems
Wenger, E. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072002 · Cited by 4,274 · cited 2×
“…ability to innovate in the face of change and complexity has long been a characteristic of professional communities, occurring regularly among scientists, artists, scholars, doctors, engineers, and other professionals (John-Steiner, 1997, 2000; Lee and Cole, 2003; Miles et al., 2005; Wenger, 2000).”
Background
Cited by
Short, J. C., Ketchen, D. J., Shook, C. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309342746 · Cited by 816
Self-citationBUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
SCHNEIDER, S., & SPIETH, P. (2013) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s136391961340001x · Cited by 729
Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308330558 · Cited by 707
Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development1
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703471 · Cited by 698
Pandemics and Supply Chain Management Research: Toward a Theoretical Toolbox*
Craighead, C. W., Ketchen, D. J., & Darby, J. L. (2020) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/deci.12468 · Cited by 445
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C.
- Venue
- Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 371-385
- ISSN
- 1932-4391 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-443X
- OpenAlex
- W2053628908
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 21.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sej.20
- The paper
- Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.