Zero‐inflated models for regression analysis of count data: a study of growth and development
Abstract
Poisson regression is widely used in medical studies, and can be extended to negative binomial regression to allow for heterogeneity. When there is an excess number of zero counts, a useful approach is to used a mixture model with a proportion P of subjects not at risk, and a proportion of 1‐P at‐risk subjects who take on outcome values following a Poisson or negative binomial distribution. Covariate effects can be incorporated into both components of the models. In child assessment, fine motor development is often measured by test items that involve a process of imitation and a process of fine motor exercise. One such developmental milestone is ‘building a tower of cubes’. This study analyses the impact of foetal growth and postnatal somatic growth on this milestone, operationalized as the number of cubes and measured around the age of 22 months. It is shown that the two aspects of early growth may have different implications for imitation and fine motor dexterity. The usual approach of recording and analysing the milestone as a binary outcome, such as whether the child can build a tower of three cubes, may leave out important information. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Examination of the data distribution revealed an excessive number of zeros above and beyond the expected frequency under the Poisson law (structural zeros).
“However, examination of the data distribution revealed that there was an excessive number of zeros that was above and beyond the expected frequency under the Poisson law, a phenomenon known as structural zeros (Cheung 2002; Kowalski and Tu 2007).”
From Intervention to Strengthen Emotional Self-Regulation in Children with Emerging Mental Health Problems: Proximal Impact on School Behavior (2010) · cites this paper as Cheung 2002
Cites
Comparative aspects of the brain growth spurt
Dobbing, J., & Sands, J. (1979) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/0378-3782(79)90022-7 · Cited by 2,506 · see citing works
On the Variances of Asymptotically Normal Estimators from Complex Surveys
Binder, D. A. (1983) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1402588 · Cited by 982 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collins, C. A., Olsen, I., Zammit, P. S., Heslop, L., Petrie, A., Partridge, T. A., & Morgan, J. E. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.010 · Cited by 1,445 · see citing works
Wyman, P. A., Cross, W., Hendricks Brown, C., Yu, Q., Tu, X., & Eberly, S. (2010) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9398-x · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Chapman, B., Duberstein, P., & Lyness, J. M. (2007) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/62.6.p343 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Moineddin, R., Meaney, C., Agha, M., Zagorski, B., & Glazier, R. H. (2011) · BMC Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/1471-227x-11-13 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Maia, D. B., Nóbrega, A., Marques-Portella, C., Mendlowicz, M. V., Volchan, E., Coutinho, E. S., & Figueira, I. (2014) · Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1267 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Behavior-focused alternative schools: Impact on student outcomes
Wilkerson, K., Afacan, K., Perzigian, A., Justin, W., & Lequia, J. (2016) · Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.17988/0198-7429-41.2.81 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cheung, Y. B.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1461-1469
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
- 1097-0258
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review