The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regression models for relative survival
Abstract
Four approaches to estimating a regression model for relative survival using the method of maximum likelihood are described and compared. The underlying model is an additive hazards model where the total hazard is written as the sum of the known baseline hazard and the excess hazard associated with a diagnosis of cancer. The excess hazards are assumed to be constant within pre‐specified bands of follow‐up. The likelihood can be maximized directly or in the framework of generalized linear models. Minor differences exist due to, for example, the way the data are presented (individual, aggregated or grouped), and in some assumptions (e.g. distributional assumptions). The four approaches are applied to two real data sets and produce very similar estimates even when the assumption of proportional excess hazards is violated. The choice of approach to use in practice can, therefore, be guided by ease of use and availability of software. We recommend using a generalized linear model with a Poisson error structure based on collapsed data using exact survival times. The model can be estimated in any software package that estimates GLMs with user‐defined link functions (including SAS, Stata, S‐plus, and R) and utilizes the theory of generalized linear models for assessing goodness‐of‐fit and studying regression diagnostics. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Cited by
Cervantes, F., Dupriez, B., Pereira, A., Passamonti, F., Reilly, J. T., Morra, E., Vannucchi, A. M., Mesa, R. A., Demory, J.-L., Barosi, G., et al. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449 · Cited by 1,255
Cancer survival in China, 2003–2005: A population‐based study
Zeng, H., Zheng, R., Guo, Y., Zhang, S., Zou, X., Wang, N., Zhang, L., Tang, J., Chen, J., Wei, K., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.29227 · Cited by 622
Lemos, B. D., Storer, B. E., Iyer, J. G., Phillips, J. L., Bichakjian, C. K., Fang, L. C., Johnson, T. M., Liegeois-Kwon, N. J., Otley, C. C., Paulson, K. G., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.056 · Cited by 559
Gatta, G., Botta, L., Sánchez, M. J., Anderson, L. A., Pierannunzio, D., Licitra, L., Hackl, M., Zielonke, N., Oberaigner, W., Van Eycken, E., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.043 · Cited by 485
Johnson, L. F., Mossong, J., Dorrington, R. E., Schomaker, M., Hoffmann, C. J., Keiser, O., Fox, M. P., Wood, R., Prozesky, H., Giddy, J., et al. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001418 · Cited by 437
Estimating and Modeling Relative Survival
Dickman, P. W., & Coviello, E. (2015) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1501500112 · Cited by 353
Self-citationHypermethylator Phenotype in Sporadic Colon Cancer: Study on a Population-Based Series of 582 Cases
Barault, L., Charon-Barra, C., Jooste, V., de la Vega, M. F., Martin, L., Roignot, P., Rat, P., Bouvier, A.-M., Laurent-Puig, P., Faivre, J., et al. (2008) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1171 · Cited by 286
Torgerson, P. R., Schweiger, A., Deplazes, P., Pohar, M., Reichen, J., Ammann, R. W., Tarr, P. E., Halkik, N., & Müllhaupt, B. (2008) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.03.023 · Cited by 274
Norlén, O., Stålberg, P., Öberg, K., Eriksson, J., Hedberg, J., Hessman, O., Janson, E. T., Hellman, P., & Åkerström, G. (2012) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1296-z · Cited by 260
Flexible parametric models for relative survival, with application in coronary heart disease
Nelson, C. P., Lambert, P. C., Squire, I. B., & Jones, D. R. (2007) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3064 · Cited by 256
Risk of Suicide After Cancer Diagnosis in England
Henson, K. E., Brock, R., Charnock, J., Wickramasinghe, B., Will, O., & Pitman, A. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3181 · Cited by 247
Ludwig, H., Durie, B. G. M., Bolejack, V., Turesson, I., Kyle, R. A., Blade, J., Fonseca, R., Dimopoulos, M., Shimizu, K., San Miguel, J., et al. (2008) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2007-03-081018 · Cited by 230
Mortality in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: A register-based cohort study in Sweden
Reutfors, J., Andersson, T. M.-L., Brenner, P., Brandt, L., DiBernardo, A., Li, G., Hägg, D., Wingård, L., & Bodén, R. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.030 · Cited by 94
Alabas, O. A., Hall, M., Dondo, T. B., Rutherford, M. J., Timmis, A. D., Batin, P. D., Deanfield, J. E., Hemingway, H., & Gale, C. P. (2017) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2016-207402 · Cited by 51
The Will Rogers phenomenon in the staging of breast cancer—does it matter?
Tan, G. H., Bhoo-Pathy, N., Taib, N. A., See, M. H., Jamaris, S., & Yip, C. H. (2015) · Cancer Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.canep.2014.11.005 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickman, P. W., Sloggett, A., Hills, M., & Hakulinen, T.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-64
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2147416239
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
