On the C‐statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data
Open accessAbstract
For modern evidence‐based medicine, a well thought‐out risk scoring system for predicting the occurrence of a clinical event plays an important role in selecting prevention and treatment strategies. Such an index system is often established based on the subject's ‘baseline’ genetic or clinical markers via a working parametric or semi‐parametric model. To evaluate the adequacy of such a system, C‐statistics are routinely used in the medical literature to quantify the capacity of the estimated risk score in discriminating among subjects with different event times. The C‐statistic provides a global assessment of a fitted survival model for the continuous event time rather than focussing on the prediction of bit ‐year survival for a fixed time. When the event time is possibly censored, however, the population parameters corresponding to the commonly used C‐statistics may depend on the study‐specific censoring distribution. In this article, we present a simple C‐statistic without this shortcoming. The new procedure consistently estimates a conventional concordance measure which is free of censoring. We provide a large sample approximation to the distribution of this estimator for making inferences about the concordance measure. Results from numerical studies suggest that the new procedure performs well in finite sample. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Uno's c statistic can be expanded to a global measure, across all time points.
“Uno's c statistic can be expanded to a global measure, across all time points.”
From Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 1,535
- Authors
- Uno, H., Cai, T., Pencina, M. J., D'Agostino, R. B., & Wei, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Uno, Hajime
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-13
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1105-1117
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- PMC
- PMC3079915
- OpenAlex
- W2120579447
- Cited by
- 1,535
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 185 · 2025: 162 · 2024: 164 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 29.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Collection of Biostatistics Research Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1, N01-HC 25195)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195, N01-HC-025195)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM079330)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI024643, R01AI052817)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- concordance index, concordance measures, risk prediction, censored survival data, risk scoring, time-to-event prediction, censoring distribution, large sample approximation, risk discrimination
- MeSH terms
- Breast Neoplasms, Cardiovascular Diseases, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review