Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,027

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: Strengths and limitations

Demets, David L.·1987·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

Methods for combining data from several studies exist and appear to be quite useful. None satisfactorily addresses the question of what studies should be combined. This issue is the most serious methodological limitation. Even studies with statistically significant interaction might still be combined if the effect were in the same direction. Thus, substantial scientific input is required as to what criteria must be met by each potential study. Much can be learned from combining or pooling data but it must be done cautiously. Pooling exercises do not replace well designed prospective clinical trials. Efforts for establishing basic design criteria to allow for multicentre and multicountry trials to be more easily combined might be useful.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.4780060325

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,027

Metadata

Authors
Demets, D. L.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-04
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
341-348
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2086148792
Cited by
1,027
References
3
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.