The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample size requirements for reliability studies
Abstract
This paper provides exact power contours to guide the planning of reliability studies, where the parameter of interest is the coefficient of intraclass correlation p derived from a one‐way analysis of variance model. The contours display the required numbers of subjects k and number of repeated measurements n that provide 80 per cent power for testing Ho:ρ ⩽ ρ o versus H 1: ρ > ρ o at the 5 per cent level of significance for selected values of po. We discuss the design considerations of these results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Cited by
Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics
Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.07-034-r2 · Cited by 1,665
Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision
Bonett, D. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1108 · Cited by 987
Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing
Streiner, D. L., & Kottner, J. (2014) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12402 · Cited by 463
Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results
Shoukri, M. M., Asyali, M. H., & Donner, A. (2004) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1191/0962280204sm365ra · Cited by 459
Self-citationReliability of Scoring Respiratory Disturbance Indices and Sleep Staging
Whitney, C. W., Gottlieb, D. J., Redline, S., Norman, R. G., Dodge, R. R., Shahar, E., Surovec, S., & Nieto, F. J. (1998) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/21.7.749 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Donner, A., & Eliasziw, M.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 441-448
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2129462449
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sample size requirements for reliability studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.4780060404
- The paper
- Donner, A., & Eliasziw, M. (1987). Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
