Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group sequential procedures: Calendar versus information time

Lan, K. K. Gordon, Demets, David L.·1989·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

This paper describes the relationship between information time and calendar time in the use of group sequential procedures to monitor interim analyses of clinical trials. Information time is the proportion of maximum subjects or events already observed. Interim analyses often occur at specified calendar times while the definition of classic group sequential procedures occurs in terms of information time. We extend the general group sequential approach of Lan and DeMets 1 to include this situation as well.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.4780081003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Lan, K. K. G., & Demets, D. L.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-10
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
1191-1198
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2055502243
Cited by
168
References
2
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group sequential procedures: Calendar versus information time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.4780081003
The paper
Lan, K. K. G., & Demets, D. L. (1989). Group sequential procedures: Calendar versus information time. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780081003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.