The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations
Abstract
Moment methods for analysing repeated binary responses have been proposed by Liang and Zeger, and extended by Prentice and Zhao and Prentice. In these estimating equations, models are proposed for the correlation between the repeated binary responses. We extend Liang and Zeger's method to models for the correlation between repeated nominal or ordinal categorical responses; in particular, when the repeated responses are binary, our methods reduce to Liang and Zeger's method. Our method is illustrated with two datasets. One dataset contains repeated observations of self‐assessment of arthritis, an ordered variable with three categories, collected during a randomized comparative study of alternative treatments of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The second dataset is a longitudinal study of the health effects of air pollution, in which the repeated ordered multinomial response is the wheezing status (no wheeze, wheeze with cold, wheeze apart from cold) of a child at ages 9, 10, 11 and 12 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Cited by
Heijl, A. (2002) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268 · Cited by 3,320
Wolf, S. L., Barnhart, H. X., Kutner, N. G., McNeely, E., Coogler, C., Xu, T., & Atlanta FICSIT Group (1996) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01432.x · Cited by 1,142
LaValley, M. P. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.682658 · Cited by 1,114
de Langen, A. J., Johnson, M. L., Mazieres, J., Dingemans, A.-M. C., Mountzios, G., Pless, M., Wolf, J., Schuler, M., Lena, H., Skoulidis, F., et al. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00221-0 · Cited by 619
Hoffman, R. E., Hawkins, K. A., Gueorguieva, R., Boutros, N. N., Rachid, F., Carroll, K., & Krystal, J. H. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.1.49 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Lipsitz, S. R., Kim, K., & Zhao, L.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-06-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1149-1163
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2018143015
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.4780131106
- The paper
- Lipsitz, S. R., Kim, K., & Zhao, L. (1994). Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780131106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.