The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: The marginal approach
Abstract
Multivariate failure time data are commonly encountered in scientific investigations because each study subject may experience multiple events or because there exists clustering of subjects such that failure times within the same cluster are correlated. In this paper, I present a general methodology for analysing such data, which is analogous to that of Liang and Zeger for longitudinal data analysis. This approach formulates the marginal distributions of multivariate failure times with the familiar Cox proportional hazards models while leaving the nature of dependence among related failure times completely unspecified. The baseline hazard functions for the marginal models may be identical or different. Simple estimating equations for the regression parameters are developed which yield consistent and asymptotically normal estimators, and robust variance‐covarinace estimators are constructed to account for the intra‐class correlation. Simulation results demonstrate that the large‐sample approximations are adequate for practical use and that ignoring the intra‐class correlation could yield rather misleading variance estimators. The proposed methodology has been fully implemented in a simple computer program which also incorporates several alternative approaches. Detailed illustrations with data from four clinical or epidemiologic studies are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
Andersen, P. K., & Gill, R. D. (1982) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345976 · Cited by 4,419
Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modeling marginal distributions
Wei, L. J., Lin, D. Y., & Weissfeld, L. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478873 · Cited by 1,868
Self-citation
Cited by
Lear, S. A., Hu, W., Rangarajan, S., Gasevic, D., Leong, D., Iqbal, R., Casanova, A., Swaminathan, S., Anjana, R. M., Kumar, R., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31634-3 · Cited by 1,331
Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies
Lin, D. Y., Psaty, B. M., & Kronmal, R. A. (1998) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533848 · Cited by 742
Self-citationPenalized Survival Models and Frailty
Therneau, T. M., Grambsch, P. M., & Pankratz, V. S. (2003) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/1061860031365 · Cited by 481
Some Simple Robust Methods for the Analysis of Recurrent Events
Lawless, J. F., & Nadeau, C. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484300 · Cited by 462
Mortality Effects of Community Socioeconomic Status
Anderson, R. T., Sorlie, P., Backlund, E., Johnson, N., & Kaplan, G. A. (1997) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199701000-00007 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, D. Y.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-11-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2233-2247
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W1985390432
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: The marginal approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.4780132105
- The paper
- Lin, D. Y. (1994). Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: The marginal approach. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780132105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.