The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files
Abstract
Probabilistic linkage technology makes it feasible and efficient to link large public health databases in a statistically justifiable manner. The problem addressed by the methodology is that of matching two files of individual data under conditions of uncertainty. Each field is subject to error which is measured by the probability that the field agrees given a record pair matches (called the m probability) and probabilities of chance agreement of its value states (called the u probability). Fellegi and Sunter pioneered record linkage theory. Advances in methodology include use of an EM algorithm for parameter estimation, optimization of matches by means of a linear sum assignment program, and more recently, a probability model that addresses both m and u probabilities for all value states of a field. This provides a means for obtaining greater precision from non‐uniformly distributed fields, without the theoretical complications arising from frequency‐based matching alone. The model includes an interative parameter estimation procedure that is more robust than pre‐match estimation techniques. The methodology was originally developed and tested by the author at the U.S. Census Bureau for census undercount estimation. The more recent advances and a new generalized software system were tested and validated by linking highway crashes to Emergency Medical Service (EMS) reports and to hospital admission records for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Cited by
Jacobs, I., Nadkarni, V., Bahr, J., Berg, R. A., Billi, J. E., Bossaert, L., Cassan, P., Coovadia, A., D’Este, K., Finn, J., et al. (2004) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.09.008 · Cited by 914
Bergmann, M. M., Calle, E. E., Mervis, C. A., Miracle-McMahill, H. L., Thun, M. J., & Health, C. W. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009487 · Cited by 265
Fox, M. P., Bor, J., Brennan, A. T., MacLeod, W. B., Maskew, M., Stevens, W. S., & Carmona, S. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002589 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaro, M. A.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5-7
- Pages
- 491-498
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2128600649
- Cited by
- 782
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.4780140510
- The paper
- Jaro, M. A. (1995). Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780140510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.