The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Twenty‐five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls
Open accessAbstract
‘Multistage testing with adaptive designs’ was the title of an article by Peter Bauer that appeared 1989 in the German journal Biometrie und Informatik in Medizin und Biologie. The journal does not exist anymore but the methodology found widespread interest in the scientific community over the past 25 years. The use of such multistage adaptive designs raised many controversial discussions from the beginning on, especially after the publication by Bauer and Köhne 1994 in Biometrics: Broad enthusiasm about potential applications of such designs faced critical positions regarding their statistical efficiency. Despite, or possibly because of, this controversy, the methodology and its areas of applications grew steadily over the years, with significant contributions from statisticians working in academia, industry and agencies around the world. In the meantime, such type of adaptive designs have become the subject of two major regulatory guidance documents in the US and Europe and the field is still evolving. Developments are particularly noteworthy in the most important applications of adaptive designs, including sample size reassessment, treatment selection procedures, and population enrichment designs. In this article, we summarize the developments over the past 25 years from different perspectives. We provide a historical overview of the early days, review the key methodological concepts and summarize regulatory and industry perspectives on such designs. Then, we illustrate the application of adaptive designs with three case studies, including unblinded sample size reassessment, adaptive treatment selection, and adaptive endpoint selection. We also discuss the availability of software for evaluating and performing such designs. We conclude with a critical review of how expectations from the beginning were fulfilled, and – if not – discuss potential reasons why this did not happen. © 2015 The Authors.Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them
Pallmann, P., Bedding, A. W., Choodari-Oskooei, B., Dimairo, M., Flight, L., Hampson, L. V., Holmes, J., Mander, A. P., Odondi, L., Sydes, M. R., et al. (2018) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1017-7 · Cited by 829
Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials
Bhatt, D. L., & Mehta, C. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1510061 · Cited by 499
Phase II Trials in Drug Development and Adaptive Trial Design
Van Norman, G. A. (2019) · JACC: Basic to Translational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.02.005 · Cited by 133
Dimairo, M., Pallmann, P., Wason, J., Todd, S., Jaki, T., Julious, S. A., Mander, A. P., Weir, C. J., Koenig, F., Walton, M. K., et al. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04334-x · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, P., Bretz, F., Dragalin, V., König, F., & Wassmer, G.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-16
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-347
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2144024999
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twenty‐five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.6472
- The paper
- Bauer, P., Bretz, F., Dragalin, V., König, F., & Wassmer, G. (2016). Twenty‐five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.