The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient
Abstract
Reproducibility of a quantitative outcome is usually assessed by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). When we are interested in assessing reproducibility from only one sample, we suggest that the study be planned with regards to the expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the ICC. An approximation of this latter width is derived, which allows appraisal of the influence of n the number of subjects and p the number of replicates. Through simulation studies, the approximation is shown to be of good accuracy and can therefore be used reliably. Optimal designs are also discussed such as the optimal distribution between the number of subjects and the number of replicates per subject for a fixed total number of measures. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Cited by
(2011) · Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository · Cited by 1,209
Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance
Zou, G. Y. (2012) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.5466 · Cited by 466
Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results
Shoukri, M. M., Asyali, M. H., & Donner, A. (2004) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1191/0962280204sm365ra · Cited by 459
Evaluation of a portable device to measure daily energy expenditure in free-living adults
St-Onge, M., Mignault, D., Allison, D. B., & Rabasa-Lhoret, R. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/85.3.742 · Cited by 397
Qualitative Attributes and Measurement Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires: A Checklist
Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., van Poppel, M. N. M., Chinapaw, M. J. M., van Mechelen, W., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11531370-000000000-00000 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Giraudeau, B., & Mary, J. Y.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10-23
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3205-3214
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2165403627
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
