The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of a single‐item measure of burnout against the Maslach Burnout Inventory among physicians
Abstract
The measurement of burnout among physicians is important because physician well‐being has the potential to affect workforce stability and quality of care. In this study, a single‐item measure of burnout was validated against the sub‐scales of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment). Survey items included the 22‐item Maslach Burnout Inventory, a single‐item measure of burnout, and other questions regarding demographics, practice characteristics, and occupational satisfaction. The surveys were mailed to Texas Tech University School of Medicine Alumni classes of 1980–1989. The response rate was 43 per cent (n = 307). Pearson correlation coefficients and ANOVA were used to determine the association between the Maslach Burnout Inventory scores and the single‐item burnout question. The single‐item was correlated at r = 0.64 (p < 0.0001) with emotional exhaustion and the ANOVA yielded an R 2 of 0.5 (p < 0.0001). Hence, in surveys of physicians where emotional exhaustion is the primary sub‐scale of interest, a single‐item measure of burnout may be used as an alternative to the Maslach Burnout Inventory in order to abbreviate survey material and potentially increase response rates among physicians. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Refining the Measurement of Physician Job Satisfaction: Results From the Physician Worklife Survey
Williams, E. S., Konrad, T. R., Linzer, M., McMurray, J., Pathman, D. E., Gerrity, M., Schwartz, M. D., Scheckler, W. E., Van Kirk, J., Rhodes, E., et al. (1999) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199911000-00006 · Cited by 267
Cited by
Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions
West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2018) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12752 · Cited by 2,768
Prevalence of Burnout Among Physicians: A Systematic Review
Rotenstein, L. S., Torre, M., Ramos, M. A., Rosales, R. C., Guille, C., Sen, S., & Mata, D. A. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12777 · Cited by 1,904
Burnout and Career Satisfaction Among American Surgeons
Shanafelt, T. D., Balch, C. M., Bechamps, G. J., Russell, T., Dyrbye, L., Satele, D., Collicott, P., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J., & Freischlag, J. A. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181ac4dfd · Cited by 1,275
Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis
Purvanova, R. K., & Muros, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.006 · Cited by 1,050
A single-item measure of social identification: reliability, validity, and utility
Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12006 · Cited by 1,021
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohland, B. M., Kruse, G. R., & Rohrer, J. E.
- Venue
- Stress and Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-79
- ISSN
- 1532-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-3005
- OpenAlex
- W1967466861
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a single‐item measure of burnout against the Maslach Burnout Inventory among physicians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smi.1002
- The paper
- Rohland, B. M., Kruse, G. R., & Rohrer, J. E. (2004). Validation of a single‐item measure of burnout against the Maslach Burnout Inventory among physicians. Stress and Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.