Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Spaceflight effects on biologySpace Exploration and TechnologyStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stress and recovery responses during a 105-day ground-based space simulation

Nicolas, Michel, Gushin, Vadim·2015·Stress and Health
DOI 10.1002/smi.2565
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present study analysed the time course of the psychological process of stress and recovery in six healthy male volunteers during the Mars 105 experimentation, a 105-day ground-based space analogue. The multidimensional assessment of stress and recovery responses showed that stress levels decreased significantly throughout the 105-day isolated and confined extreme (ICE) experiment, especially on its social dimension. In line with previous studies, Fatigue showed a global and progressive reduction. The present results suggest that ICE exposure may not systematically induce stress overload and impaired psychological states. To optimize adaptation to ICE conditions, further improvements in positive psychological effects may be possible by improving the countermeasures, as well as the screening and selection of participants, in order to enhance coping capacities and to improve the balance of recovery-stress states.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smi.2565

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Antonovsky A., 1979, Health, stress, and coping
  2. Antonovsky A., 1987, Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well
  3. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3012-0_24 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.11.008 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1736 · DOI
  6. Christensen J. M., 1986, A review of the psychological aspects of space flight, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 57, 203
  7. 10.1016/0094-5765(95)00115-8 · DOI
  8. Grigoriev A. I., 1996, Stress under normal conditions, hypokinesia simulating weightlessness, and during flights in space, Human Physiology, 22, 139
  9. 10.1029/AR022p0115 · DOI
  10. Gushin V. I., 1995, Problems of psychological control in prolonged space flights, Earth Space Review, 4, 28
  11. Gushin V. I., 1998, Subject's perception of the crew interaction under prolonged isolation, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 69, 556
  12. 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00189-8 · DOI
  13. Kanas N., 1985, Psychological factors affecting simulated and actual space missions, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 56, 806
  14. 10.1016/S1569-2574(08)60078-7 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.02.007 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.04.012 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6770-9 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0094-5765(99)00108-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1097/00005768-200003000-00019 · DOI
  20. Kellmann M., 2001, Recovery–stress questionnaire for athletes
  21. Lazarus R., 2006, Stress and emotion: A new synthesis
  22. Lazarus R., 1984, Stress, appraisal and coping
  23. 10.1016/0092-6566(89)90021-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.001 · DOI
  25. Levi L., 1974, Life, stress and illness, 8
  26. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.013 · DOI
  27. Marsh M. &Rygalov V. Y.(2008).Conceptual approach for stress estimates among astronauts and cosmonauts. SAE Technical Paper 2008‐01‐2109. · DOI
  28. 10.1080/17461390600617717 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.006 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.03.005 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.001 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90004-A · DOI
  33. 10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.353 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/00139160021972469 · DOI
  35. Palinkas L. A., 1995, Psychological functioning among members of a small polar expedition, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 66, 943
  36. Rowbottom D. G., 1998, Overtraining in sport, 47
  37. 10.1007/s11157-006-9000-8 · DOI
  38. Schneider S., 2010, Exercise as a countermeasure to psycho‐physiological deconditioning during long‐term confinement, Behavioural Brain Research, 211, 208, 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.034 · DOI
  39. Selye H., 1950, Stress
  40. Suedfeld P., 2002, Applying positive psychology in the study of extreme environments, Human performance in extreme environments: the journal of the Society for Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 6, 21
  41. 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.227 · DOI

Cited by

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Nicolas, M., & Gushin, V.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bourgogne (FR)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Corresponding author
Nicolas, Michel
ORCID
Venue
Stress and Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-25
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
403-410
ISSN
  • 1532-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-3005
DOI
10.1002/smi.2565
OpenAlex
W2150752225
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Stress and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centre Nationale d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES), France
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
psychological stress, recovery, isolated and confined environments, fatigue, social stress, coping, countermeasures, participant selection
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Humans, Male, Stress, Psychological, Space Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.