Stress and sleep remain significant predictors of health after controlling for negative affect
Open accessAbstract
Prior research has shown that the predictive power of a stress–health model can be improved by the addition of sleep as a predictor variable. However, negative affect (NA) may act as a confounding variable in stress–health relationships: a source of bias that potentially inflates the observed relationship between stress and health. The current study examines whether stress and sleep remain significant predictors of health after controlling for trait NA. An online survey containing well‐established measures of stress, sleep, health, and NA was completed by 460 undergraduates. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that stress and sleep remained significant predictors of self‐reported health after controlling for the effects of NA. Our findings support the notion that stress–health models can be improved by the integration of sleep as an additional predictor variable and demonstrate that the stress/sleep–health relationships are not fully explained by dispositional NA. From a theoretical perspective, the inclusion of NA measures allows researchers to tease apart the unique contributions of predictor variables. This knowledge can subsequently be put to the test with greater confidence in the design of interventions that seek to improve health through stress reduction and improved sleep.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of studies (n=15) were conducted in North America.
“The geographical location of the studies varied widely with the majority of (n=15) studies conducted in North America [37,44,46-58].”
From A systematic review and meta-analysis of poor sleep, insomnia symptoms and stress in undergraduate students (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Benham, G., & Charak, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Benham, Grant
- Venue
- Stress and Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-10-31
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-68
- ISSN
- 1532-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-3005
- OpenAlex
- W2895292365
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Stress and Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- stress, sleep, self-reported health, negative affect, trait negative affect, confounding variables, stress reduction intervention
- MeSH terms
- Sleepiness, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Sleep, Stress, Psychological, Students, Texas, Universities, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review