The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads
Abstract
Guided by notions from the literature on organizational learning, this paper investigates how product line experimentation and organizational performance change across the careers of top managers. Its subjects are the studio heads who ran all the major Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. The study found first, that product line experimentation declines over the course of executive tenures; second, that there is an inverse U‐shaped relationship between top executive tenure and an organization's financial performance; and third, that product line experimentation is more likely to benefit financial performance late in top executives' tenures. These findings are consistent with a three‐stage ‘executive life cycle’. During the early years of their tenures, top managers experiment intensively with their product lines to learn about their business; later on their accumulated knowledge allows them to reduce experimentation and increase performance; finally, in their last years, executives reduce experimentation still further, and performance declines. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Staw, B. M. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2 · Cited by 2,061
Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants
Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140602 · Cited by 1,058
Cited by
Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314561301 · Cited by 1,045
Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure
Lewis, B. W., Walls, J. L., & Dowell, G. W. S. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2127 · Cited by 713
Innovating Beyond the Horizon: CEO Career Horizon, Top Management Composition, and R&D Intensity
Heyden, M. L. M., Reimer, M., & Van Doorn, S. (2017) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21730 · Cited by 164
Leveraging analytics to produce compelling and profitable film content
Behrens, R., Foutz, N. Z., Franklin, M., Funk, J., Gutierrez-Navratil, F., Hofmann, J., & Leibfried, U. (2021) · Journal of Cultural Economics · doi:10.1007/s10824-019-09372-1 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, D., & Shamsie, J.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-07-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 725-745
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2032937464
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 56.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.171
- The paper
- Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (2001). Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.