The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis
Abstract
Studies done in developed economies have demonstrated a positive relationship between financial resource availability and CSR . Arguments that we term the Institutional Difference Hypothesis ( IDH ) drawn from the institutional literature, however, suggest that institutional differences between developed and developing economies are likely to result in different CSR implications. Integrating the logic of IDH with insights from slack resources theory, we argue that there exists a negative relationship between financial resource availability and CSR expenditures for firms in G hana, a sub‐ S aharan A frican emerging economy. We use lagged data from the G hana I nvestment P romotion C entre and find that Return on Sales, Return on Equity, and Net Profitability were consistently associated with lower CSR expenditures. We highlight the implications of our findings for research and managers . Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529 · cited 2×
“Mgmt. J., 34: 1314–1330 (2013) DOI: 10.1002/smj an agency cost, a diversion of corporate earnings away from their rightful owners to social causes preferred by a firm’s misdirected managers (Friedman, 1970; McWilliams, Siegel, and Wright, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialCorporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
STRATEGY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES.
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556394 · Cited by 3,835
Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x · Cited by 3,154
Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.820 · Cited by 2,252
Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom*
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.x · Cited by 1,843
Stock Market Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Critical Issues and Challenges
Adjasi, C. K., & Yartey, C. A. (2007) · IMF Working Papers · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1012992 · Cited by 260
Corporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences
Halme, M., Roome, N., & Dobers, P. (2009) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.12.001 · Cited by 123
Cited by
When firms adopt sustainable human resource management: A fuzzy‐set analysis
Jia, J., Yuan, S., Wei, L., & Tang, G. (2023) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22164 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Julian, S. D., & Ofori‐dankwa, J. C.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-25
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1314-1330
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1957804468
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 54.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.