Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using meta‐analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership‐performance relationship

Bergh, Donald D., Aguinis, Herman, Heavey, Ciaran, Ketchen, David J., Boyd, Brian K., Su, Peiran, Lau, Cubie L. L., Joo, Harry·2016·Strategic Management Journal
DOI 10.1002/smj.2338
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper demonstrates how meta‐analysis can be combined with structural equation modeling ( MASEM ) to address new questions in strategic management research. We review this integration, describe its implementation, and compare findings from bivariate meta‐analyses, a direct‐effect structural equations model, and two mediating frameworks using data on the strategic leadership and performance relationship. Results drawn from 208 articles that collectively included data on 495,638 observations demonstrate the new insights available from MASEM while also suggesting a revision to conventional thinking on strategic leadership. Whereas some theories posit that boards of directors influence firm performance through monitoring and disciplining the top management team, MASEM provides more support for the view that boards mediate the top management teams' decisions. Implications for applying MASEM in strategic management are offered . Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.2338

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aguinis H, 2009, Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends, 267
  2. 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.04.011 · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.04.011
  3. 10.1037/0003-066X.33.5.517.a · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.33.5.517.a · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199806)19:6<555::AID-SMJ955>3.0.CO;2-Y · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199806)19:6<555::aid-smj955>3.0.co;2-y
  5. 10.1002/smj.4250120205 · doi:10.1002/smj.4250120205
  6. Schmidt FL, 2005, Software for the Hunter‐Schmidt Meta‐Analysis Methods (Version 1.1) [Computer Software]
  7. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.47 · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.47 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Bergh, D. D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C., Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., Su, P., Lau, C. L. L., & Joo, H.
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-05
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
477-497
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
DOI
10.1002/smj.2338
OpenAlex
W2119362110
Cited by
355
References
92
FWCI
14.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using meta‐analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership‐performance relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.2338
The paper
Bergh, D. D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C., Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., Su, P., Lau, C. L. L., & Joo, H. (2016). Using meta‐analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership‐performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2338

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.