The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision
Abstract
Theories of absorptive capacity propose that knowledge gained from prior experience facilitates the identification, selection, and implementation of related profitable practices. Researchers have investigated how managers may develop absorptive capacity by building internal knowledge stocks, but few have focused on the distribution of this knowledge within the firm and the role managers play in administering information to organizational subunits. In this paper, we explore the degree to which managers can develop absorptive capacity by directly providing information to agents in the organization that might potentially adopt a new practice. We find that the effectiveness of managerial information provision depends on the degree to which potential adopters have information from other sources. We find that information from previous adopters and past events reduces the effect of information provision, while experience with related practices amplifies it. Our research helps clarify when absorptive capacity may provide a sustained competitive advantage. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
Cited by
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152
“…advantage (especially in complex, volatile, and uncertain external environments) has cata-pulted this issue to the forefront of the research agendas of many scholars (Daniel & Wilson, 2003; Lampel & Shamsie, 2003; Lenox & King, 2004; Salvato, 2003; Teece, Pis-ano & Shuen, 1997; Zott, 2003).”
BackgroundVan Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x · Cited by 1,335
Heimeriks, K. H., & Duysters, G. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00639.x · Cited by 530
Hospital organization culture, capacity to innovate and success in technology adoption
do Carmo Caccia‐Bava, M., Guimaraes, T., & Harrington, S. J. (2006) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/14777260610662735 · Cited by 86
Kauppi, K., Brandon‐Jones, A., Ronchi, S., & van Raaij, E. M. (2013) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2011-0445 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenox, M., & King, A.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-24
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 331-345
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2012355556
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 54.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.