The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Science as a map in technological search
Abstract
A large body of work argues that scientific research increases the rate of technological advance, and with it economic growth. The precise mechanism through which science accelerates the rate of invention, however, remains an open question. Conceptualizing invention as a combinatorial search process, this paper argues that science alters inventors' search processes, by leading them more directly to useful combinations, eliminating fruitless paths of research, and motivating them to continue even in the face of negative feedback. These mechanisms prove most useful when inventors attempt to combine highly coupled components; therefore, the value of scientific research to invention varies systematically across applications. Empirical analyses of patent data support this thesis. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function
Solow, R. M. (1957) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926047 · Cited by 12,259
Regression Analysis of Count Data
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013567 · Cited by 6,640
Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666980 · Cited by 1,862
Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00135-9 · Cited by 1,315
Self-citation
Cited by
A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0093 · Cited by 1,342
Entrepreneurship as Experimentation
Kerr, W. R., Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2014) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.28.3.25 · Cited by 704
Power law distributions in entrepreneurship: Implications for theory and research
Crawford, G. C., Aguinis, H., Lichtenstein, B., Davidsson, P., & McKelvey, B. (2015) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.001 · Cited by 195
Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., & Pastore, A. (2017) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2017-0120 · Cited by 133
NK model as a representation of innovative search
Ganco, M. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.009 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 909-928
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W3125555497
- Cited by
- 1,370
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 45.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
